Open Thread (11/21/2008)

Friday, November 21, 2008.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Look, I feel as bad as the next girl about that soldier's dogs being left alone in the house. 

http://gnightgirl.blogspot.com/2008/11/think-you-had-bad-day.html

But what about her kids?  The story says she had to buy school supplies for her two kids.  Where are they and what is happening to them?  It's wonderful to "serve your country" but if you make some babies and they don't have a father around, perhaps it is time to tell Uncle Sam that you have another competing obligation and someone else will have to be the "weekend warrior", you are not re-upping now that these kids exist.

And didn't the kids want to see their dogs?

And in a slightly unrelated development, Mark Featherstone goes to prison for 7 years for a fatal DUI, and the grandparents are left to raise Kara Holt's surviving child.  Where is that kid's father?  That would have been a nice twist to the story.  Mom gets killed by a drunk driver and dad still doesn't step up to the plate?

This post is as much about journalism as anything else.  I wish someone would ask or answer those questions, or would that ruin the appeal of the victims in these heart wrenching stories?

The AP is reporting that Attorney General Mukasey collapsed at a speaking event last night.  Last update, he was alert and conscious this morning.

 

 

 

HG

IlliniPundit's picture

I really, really, really want ESPN (and ESPN.com) to stop promoting Kenny Mayne so heavily.

I will get right on that.

Regnad Kcin's picture

Actually, the soldier owner of the dogs is responsible for their care.  If she failed to make adequate arrangements for their care, then she is the one at fault.  It seems to be a matter of poor judgment rather than criminal neglect on the soldier's part.  Hopefully the dogs are in better hands now.  Development of tumors is common in dogs.  The decision to euthanise the dog is clearly an economic decision.  Rather than spend the money for an expensive removal requiring after care and perhaps repeat visits and guarded prognosis overall, it was cheaper to just have the dog killed. 

The story was written in such a way as to suggest that the neglectful caretaker (not the soldier) was the cause of tumor and the need to euthanise was blamed on the careless caretaker as well by implication.  Such is ability of journalism to mislead the unsuspecting reader. 

I read the article several times and I failed to find the part about the soldier having 2 children as well as 3 dogs, at least 2 of which are large dogs.  It did say that the soldier was buying school supplies  but it didnt say for who.  Maybe anon knows more about the details. 

Further, this is a volunteer military servitude which the soldier is on, not a mission of honour in defending America but some adventure in imperialism and interventionalism at great expense.  All of which reminds me that we dont have any business policing or occupying Kosovo in the first place.  Bring the troops home from such exercises and many problems are resolved.

 

IlliniPundit's picture

Such empathy.

Such sympathy. 

Such humanity. 

It leaves me breathless.

Actually, the soldier owner of the dogs is responsible for their care.  If she failed to make adequate arrangements for their care, then she is the one at fault.  It seems to be a matter of poor judgment rather than criminal neglect on the soldier's part.  Hopefully the dogs are in better hands now.  Development of tumors is common in dogs.  The decision to euthanise the dog is clearly an economic decision.  Rather than spend the money for an expensive removal requiring after care and perhaps repeat visits and guarded prognosis overall, it was cheaper to just have the dog killed.

If the dog was well cared-for, maybe the tumor could have been caught earlier, which may have increased chances for survival.  I guess it would depend on what kind of tumor it was.

akibare's picture

Read the article again. She was buying school supplies for OTHER kids (presumably to distribute).  Her "two babies" are her dogs, the ones that survived.  Sure, dogs get tumors, but... still it'd be better for that dog if its last days while being sick weren't ALSO spent hungry in a neglected pee-filled house, y'know?

 

If she knew the person she allowed to live in the house and supposedly care for the dogs, I wonder if she can possibly take him to court and sue for damages?   Those companies that clean disaster houses don't come cheap.

 

Glock21's picture

It's amazing how blurry the line between superiority complexes and unadulterated hatred  can be for some people.  Sometimes it's just too much for words.

 

--

Glock21 Op/Ed

Her "two babies" are her dogs, the ones that survived.  Sure, dogs get tumors, but... still it'd be better for that dog if its last days while being sick weren't ALSO spent hungry in a neglected pee-filled house, y'know?

Definitely.  I'm on some dog-related mailing lists, and most owners really care about their dogs' last days being good ones.

Regnad Kcin's picture

It's amazing how blurry the line between superiority complexes and unadulterated hatred can be for some people. Sometimes it's just too much for words.

** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Superiority? Hatred? Coyest?

So says the guy whose avatar is a unit of the authoritarian police state fixated on attack mode?

Glock21's picture

My avatar is actually a symbol of the gun rights movement used for the last two to three decades.  The legendary figure who is famous for his rallying cry for his outnumbered army that refused to lay down arms and face subjugation.  But your reputation for being way off the mark continues to astound.

 

--

Glock21 Op/Ed

Regnad Kcin's picture

Nevertheless, departing as a willing voluntary participant in adventures in some far off land where we have no business

in the name of imperialistic policing of the world, while leaving animals uncared for

and then expecting our sympathy for material losses resulting from her irresponsible behaviour is a bit ridiculous.

*

I dont find your avatar as a symbol of gun rights.  Please provide a link.  I am interested in knowing what fringe

group of gun owners would have supported J. S,. McCain who has a F-minus rating on 2nd amendment issues.

*

And, Mr. Glock you have poked fun at every warning, and in the name of what? and to what end?

while leaving animals uncared for and then expecting our sympathy for material losses resulting from her irresponsible behaviour is a bit ridiculous.

1) Animals were not left uncared for. She found someone to take care of the dogs, but that person failed to do so. She didn't just lock the door and leave the dogs alone.

2) Sympathy was not for material losses, but rather for the health of her pets and her tragic R&R. The dogs were starving and sick, and one was put down.

And by the way, I know it's ridiculous to point at war protesters and call them "unpatriotic" and "anti-troops." In my experience, war protesters are anything but that - in fact, they're frequently more patriotic and care about the troops more than most people.

However, your feelings towards our troops are just disgusting.

I dont find your avatar as a symbol of gun rights. Please provide a link.

It's Leonidas of Sparta. Here's your link.

I am interested in knowing what fringe group of gun owners would have supported J. S,. McCain who has a F-minus rating on 2nd amendment issues.

I'm guessing the ones that weigh all of a canidate's policies, not just gun rights.

Regnad Kcin's picture

I feel no qualms whatsoever in criticizing the troops voluntarily participating in aggressive preemptive imperialistic war and wasting our money and resources that we need to be using here at home.

For those who supported McCain, Molon Labe is spoken not in defiance but as a weak, passive, and sheeplike offer of surrendering arms, and the only lion they embrace is the lyin' that they do to themselves.

Well, D. Boon can rest easy knowing he's definitely not the most despised commenter on IP.

Regnad-That is the most twisted thinking I have ever seen. You want to blame the Generals, Military leaders, Congress or Bush that’s fine go ahead. The Troops are following orders they don't make the decisions you listed. The troops and their families are sacrificing a great deal for our country. So I suggest you apologize and retract your post or I would suggest we stay on opposing sides of the room because I agree with the others you have a problem.

Dan Fielding's picture

Know what's awesome?  When someone who says lots of outrageous things to get attention goes on getting lots of attention.

I think I'll try it.  WOMEN ARE STUPID LOL.  Now reply to me fifty times to talk me out of it.

Regnad Kcin's picture

The troops and their families are sacrificing a great deal for our country.

"The troops and their families are sacrificing a great deal.

Most of them are doing so in the name of a falsehood."

Being right or wrong from one person's flawed perspective isn't really the issue.

To be a heroic person, we need the courage to fight for what we believe in, and the insight to actually choose effective actions to succeed.

Few ever really truly devote themselves to the first, and none of us are perfect enough to always be successful at the second.

 

Regnad Kcin's picture

A true Rortyian perspectivist with no means of discrimination of right and wrong would give his all for his courageous notion that 2+2=3 for smallish values of 2. "1, 2, 3 what are we fighting, 4?" is still a reasonable question for the patriot to ask.

Zeal is no measure of being in the right.  The prophets of Baal flayed themselves with knives in their zeal.  The Calvinists baptised their victims to death in their flawed fervor.  Should we applaud the troops for being zombies?

The winter soldier should consider what he is fighting for.  There is a just role for the military man and there are just causes leading a nation to war.  The Revolutionary War is unquestionable, while WWII qualifies well as a just cause war.  But there is no just cause for our recent adventures into Yugoslavia/Kosovo, Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan...  Further, it is incoherent on one hand to say that one believes in small government and on the other hand to support a quasi-global military empire that expends more than a trillion dollars per year of money that we dont have.  It is a similar non-sequitur to say that we care about people particularly the down-trodden and mistreated innocents of the world yet we ignore their needs and send them brutal authority instead of understanding.  For their cries for warmth we send them napalm and explosives, we clothe them with their own blood and that of their family members, and for nourishment we give them embargos and economic sanctions, and dare to say that the snuffing of their expendible lives was somehow "worth it".

*

Now your new Prez will send your brave troops to Afghanistan.   "Heh." 

When are you people sheep ever going to Wake Up? 

Jimmy Carter clobbered the American Farmer while swinging at Russia in the fiasco of Afghanistan in 79-80...

...American intelligence services began to aid the rebel factions in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet deployment. On July 3, 1979, US President Jimmy Carter signed an executive order authorizing the CIA to conduct covert propaganda operations against the communist regime.  Carter advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski stated "According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise." Brzezinski himself played a fundamental role in crafting U.S. policy, which, unbeknownst even to the mujahideen, was part of a larger strategy "to induce a Soviet military intervention." In a 1998 interview with Le Nouvel Observateur, Brzezinski recalled:

    We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would...That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Soviets into the Afghan trap...The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the Soviet Union its Vietnam War.

Additionally, on July 3, 1979, U.S. President Carter signed a presidential finding authorizing funding for anticommunist guerrillas in Afghanistan.  As a part of the Central Intelligence Agency program Operation Cyclone, the massive arming of Afghanistan's mujahideen was started.

*

I do want you to get mad.  Get mad at me if you want, but better yet direct your anger at the puppet masters who are playing you like a flute, right and left.

 

 

 

Glock21's picture

"Know what's awesome?  When someone who says lots of outrageous things to get attention goes on getting lots of attention."

 

Dan... sorry, I feel mostly to blame for the last few days of it.  Apologies to all for feeding the troll.

 

--

Glock21 Op/Ed

As with a child throwing a tantrum, if you ignore him he eventually stops or goes away.