On December 3rd, 2009 at 07:05 AM, Anonymous (not verified) said:
Glad to see that the White House is now willing to admit that they might have had a hand in the gate crashers as well, but I am a tad bit confused, as I thought that the President ran on a campaign of "transparancy" in government. For them to claim that the Social Secretary in charge of dinner plans cant testify before congress, and a Democratic one as well, does seem that "transparancy" only goes so far.
But why did they throw the USSS under the bus for so long before they realized that they had something to do with this?
Oh well, hope and change.
On December 3rd, 2009 at 01:45 PM, Anonymous (not verified) said:
Glad to see that the White House is now willing to admit that they might have had a hand in the gate crashers as well, but I am a tad bit confused, as I thought that the President ran on a campaign of "transparancy" in government. For them to claim that the Social Secretary in charge of dinner plans cant testify before congress, and a Democratic one as well, does seem that "transparancy" only goes so far.
But why did they throw the USSS under the bus for so long before they realized that they had something to do with this?
Oh well, hope and change.
Happy 191st Birthday, Illinois.