Open Thread (12/23/2009)

Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Where is the press on the back room nature of the so-called health care reform? This has been straight Chicago politics all the way. Villify the opposition. Keep the real deals a secret. Do the deal when no one's looking. This is a crock that we have to pay for.As the POTUS himself stated as a candidate "We can no longer accept a process that doles out earmarks based on a member of Congress' seniority, rather than the merit of the project" Hmmm. I wonder what those democrats were talking about at one oclock in the morning when they changed their mind. Is it too much to ask the press to give a liitle more air time to the new disparities on funding Medicare betwen the states?

Interesting civic lessons via C-SPAN programming helping John Q.Public better understand the procedural "high jinks" being played out during all of the health care discussions on both sides of the aisles in both House and Senate. For the politically uneducated, such as myself, the inner workings are totally amazing--never for the health, safety, and welfare of the country as a whole.  :-)

Pattsi Petrie

Arvid's picture

Where is the press on the back room nature of the so-called health care reform? This has been straight Chicago politics all the way. Villify the opposition. Keep the real deals a secret. Do the deal when no one's looking.

I love how there's this declaration of this being "Chicago politics" when in reality, not only are downstate small-town politics are significantly more corrupt than Chicago politics, but this is is the same "politics as usual" game that has been played since 1776.

-----
This last post conclusively proves that Arvid is in fact Laurel Prussing. Sad. - Anonymous on 2009-06-22 @ 9:30am

Is it too much to ask the press to give a liitle more air time to the new disparities on funding Medicare betwen the states?

Welcome to our world.  I was saying the same thing, repeatedly, in the months leading up to the Iraq War.  Where is the press?  Where is the scrutiny?  Is this really happening?

While I don't think health care reform is going to be as big a tragedy as Iraq (in fact, there are some really great things in this legislation) I would humbly suggest you do what we did: protest.  Write letters to the editor.  Engage with local blogs.  Send money to anti-reform organizations.  Do your best to fight the good fight and stand on principle.

Of course, in my opinion the real problem with this legislation (like the stimulus) is that it doesn't go far enough.  It essentially insures that the private insurance industry will rake in insane profits for decades to come.  The real crime here, imo, is that lack of reform.  This legislation will fail to solve the problems of health care in this country because America really needs a universal, single-payer system instead of this hodge-podge of profit taking on the backs of the sick and elderly.

This is the beginning of the, "yeah, but Obama wasn't really a liberal" rationalization that will be used to justify the failure of his policies.  And it is true.

If only somebody in this country had a damned spine.  Sigh.

redstatewannabe's picture

A, it is good to hear that you are upset with Obama - it makes me feel better. (Note - this is how conservatives felt about plenty of GW's initiatives.)  Sadly, I think this health care "reform" is baby step #1 toward the universal health care that Obama and you want.

The "press" is on the unemployment line or retraining for new occupations. The New York Times fired 20 percent of its staffers, the Chicago Tribune is bankrupt and can't even sell its own Tower for condos -- no one wanted it.  So here's what is left -- a bunch of bloggers in Hollweird commenting on drunk socialites.  Sun-Times Company scribes got no raises and a 15 percent cut in pay this year.

The press barons twisted 20 percent profit margins from their ink-saturated product for centuries and failed to put-up paywalls and change with the times.

So there you have it. Professional journalists have been fired. You get what you pay for. How much did it cost to click on a news web site today?

"small-town politics are significantly more corrupt than Chicago politics" 

How many federal investigations/prosecutions of Monticello, Tuscola, Catlin have there been?

On what do you base your blanket smear, Mr. Arvid?

Where is the outrage? A group of thugs beats some guy in the Garden Hills area, not only does the NG not cover it, but none of the media ( with the exception of callers to Penny) reported the race of the suspects. Is there a reason why the paper does not on a regular basis put down the race of the suspects or are we being PC with this?

http://www.newsgazette.com/news/local/2009/12/23/man_attacked_on_walk_home_in_garden_hills_area Here is the story.. now who are we looking for? Young utes? Ages? Height? Weight? How about race? There is that nasty word again. Race.

Keith_Hays's picture

How about race? There is that nasty word again. Race.

Do you want us to infer that the man walking home was Caucasian because he had been at the bowling alley? Do you expect us to assume that because the thugs that attacked him were violent that they were Black? I am sure that in private you use a different word to describe them. It just goes to show you don't it!

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

It's garden hills.  It was probably the "so icy" kids again. 

Could just have easily been a black fellow bowling as anyone else. Just a bunch of kids with too much time on their hands looking for someone easy to rob.  Too bad he wasn't packing heat, but I bet he will be next time. 

 

 

Keith-

Facts are facts. The guy was white, the kids were black. Whats to infer? Those are simply facts.

I would like to see the NG and other media begin to report the race of suspects when they are not apprehended, and that the Sheriffs department ( as many do) release the public information about the bookings that they have at the jail on a daily basis. Is it wrong to ask for that?

Keith_Hays's picture

Facts are facts. The guy was white, the kids were black. Whats to infer? Those are simply facts.

Until you share with us the basis of your knowledge your "facts" are simply rumor.

The fact is that the alleged victim was a human being and the alleged perpetrators were human beings. Their skin pigmentation or lack thereof are not relevant to a discussion of the crime.

Or is it your contention that we should assign criminal characteristics to people based upon their ethnicity as for example the Irish and Italian mobs?

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

I disagree. I think race is relevant. It should never be used to stereotype or assign blame to others in the group, but race holds special significance in our society whether it should or not.

Some will use the information to try to spark bigoted outrage (see above). Others will use the information to actually address some of the many problems in our society.

Without discussion of race, those pushing bigoted values (see above) will merely keep their thoughts in their head as they act rather than share them for the whole world to see and judge (the actions, not the people).

On December 24th, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Keith_Hays said:

Facts are facts. The guy was white, the kids were black. Whats to infer? Those are simply facts.

Until you share with us the basis of your knowledge your "facts" are simply rumor.

The fact is that the alleged victim was a human being and the alleged perpetrators were human beings. Their skin pigmentation or lack thereof are not relevant to a discussion of the crime.

Or is it your contention that we should assign criminal characteristics to people based upon their ethnicity as for example the Irish and Italian mobs?

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

 

 

I took the time to go to the station and look at the media report log and there it was.  Then Channel 3 reported it on the news with the victims daughter   being white  ( they did not revel the suspects description  -- too PC I guess)    Penny for your thoughts host was talking about this today.  So I think that between   those three sources that we can figure it out that it was a grouip of B/M attacking a W/M for no apparent reason.

 

But then I am racist for bringing that up.  Of course if it was a group of W/M attackiung a B/M Rev Jackson et al would be here in a minute.  Merry Christmas Xian....My Christmas wish to you is that you NEVER have to call 911 to bring those racist police officers to your home.

Keith/xian-

here is the media copy. Remind me again why the media refused to list the suspects race in the reports.

C09-13131 BATTERY-AGGRAVATED 720-5/12-4,4.2,4.2-5
LOCATION: KIRK / JOANNE
OCCURRED:12/21/2009 20:20 REPORTED: 12/21/2009 20:26
OFFICER: TALBOTT,MICHAEL A.
SUMMARY: VICTIM REPORTED HE WAS BATTERED BY FIVE UNKNOWN BLACK MALES.
PEOPLE: VICTIM AGE: 53 SEX: M CHAMPAIGN IL
OFFENDER AGE: 00 SEX: M RACE: B HEIGHT: 000 WEIGHT: 000 HAIR: EYES:
OFFENDER AGE: 00 SEX: M RACE: B HEIGHT: 000 WEIGHT: 000 HAIR: EYES:
OFFENDER AGE: 00 SEX: M RACE: B HEIGHT: 000 WEIGHT: 000 HAIR: EYES:
OFFENDER AGE: 00 SEX: M RACE: B HEIGHT: 000 WEIGHT: 000 HAIR: EYES:

Keith_Hays's picture

WOW!

Having received a report that a 53 year old male - race not given- of Champaign IL had been battered 6 minutes ago and the description of the offenders was only that they were black males it would obviously have given you probable cause to shoot the first 5 black males you came to. You seem to be falling down on the job!

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

Glock21's picture

I'm guessing those other fields are filled in once they get first hand confirmation from an ID or apprehending them, but still... the fact that the only description of the subjects are black and male sounds more like a Chris Rock joke about how the police racially profile. My first glance at that had me thinking of the APB going out on the radio, "Suspects are described as black and male... be on the look out..."

 

--

Glock21 Op/Ed

You as always Keith miss the point.

You wanted the reason I said that they were black suspects and now I have printed that out for you. When can you finally accept the fact that I knew ( more than you) about what I was talking about?

But of course if the victim was armed, under Keiths logic he could not shoot back for there was no "intent" to actually kill him, just put him in the hospital.

Merry Christmas Keith. My wish for you, as with Xian, is to NEVER EVER call the police,unless your charging them 200.00 per hour for " legal" advice on how to get their pension rights.

And my Christmas wish is that the Carrington civil case gives the CPD the good, hard, and badly needed shake the SA and mayor failed to provide.

mjerryfuerst's picture

What a wonderful discussion for this season.

Michael Fuerst       

 

Keith_Hays's picture

Merry Christmas Keith. My wish for you, as with Xian, is to NEVER EVER call the police,unless your charging them 200.00 per hour for " legal" advice on how to get their pension rights.

And, Officer, my Christmas prayer for you is that you be granted peace and release from torment that you may understand the meaning of God's gift to all men of good will at Christmas time.

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

Why would the police pay $200/hr for legal advice from a teacher? Or were you too lazy to write a personalized hate message for me so you just tagged me on?

I'm still wondering what anonymous' point is. Based on his comments, it's clearly not enough to identify the race in the situation (which I supported). It's clearly also justify the horrible actions of a small minority of police officers who use race as an excuse to batter or kill youth of color.

Despicable.

Race is relevant, because activists in this community maintain that blacks are unfairly targeted by police as perpetrators of crime. Yet, strangely, a very high percentage of armed robbery and assaults in CU are reported as being committed by black males. Of course, we must realize all of those victims reporting the race of their attackers as black are closet KKK white supremacists lying through their teeth to discredit the black community .

Sure, it could be that racism is caused by bad minorities bringing up race. It's the same way that slaves complaining about their conditions caused racism right? Or minorities complaining about racial profiling causes racism? Just click your heels together and it goes away right/

Or maybe the problem is white supremacists on an internet web site who believe that because crime statistics among blacks are higher that somehow means that other blacks are responsible?

 

 

mjerryfuerst's picture

If those who "settled" the New World had been black, and those brought to the New World as slaves were white, we would be having the same problem today, although with skin colors in reversed roles.

Michael Fuerst       

 

Dan Fielding's picture

Notice only two registered users went on arguing here on Christmas.

Keith_Hays's picture

Race is relevant, because activists in this community maintain that blacks are unfairly targeted by police as perpetrators of crime.

It would be easy to respond in kind; to stereotype all police officers as blustering, bigoted, bullies who chose their occupation to satisfy some psychological need to overcome a sense of inbred inferiority. That would be as inaccurate as claiming an inherent link between pigmentation and criminality. Most police officers have chosen their occupation for more noble reasons and who recognize that their authority must be wielded responsibility in keeping with the most cherished principles of our Republic - fairness and a respect for the rights or each individual regardless of that individuals race or ethnicity.

Your comment seems to suggest that you wish the race of every Black person, identified or not, be loudly trumpeted in the media so as to rebut the perception that it is unfair to target Black citizens as genetically disposed to crime. It seems to suggest that the media has a duty to reinforce the stereotype that any person of color should be regarded as objects of fear and suspicion; that you have preferred that the News-Gazette headlined its article, FIVE BLACK THUGS ATTACK WHITE CITIZEN based upon the vague report that you published here. What purpose would that have served?

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

What purpose would that have served?

Whatever purpose it might or might not serve, repressing a indeputable factual statement in the press is inappropriate

illinipunditposter

 

I had no part on the story about the man being attacked, but I can tell you that it's general press policy not to offer a description if there isn't one. It serves no purpose to tell readers that the alleged criminals were 0 feet tall and weighed 0 pounds. If you do see anybody of that description, be sure to call the police.

Notice only two registered users went on arguing here on Christmas.

Yes, two registered users continued to discuss race on Christmas.

One anonymous user continued to try to draw a link between dark skin and crime.

One registered user stayed up to 2am on Christmas to drop a one line personal attack.

Arvid's picture

Notice only two registered users went on arguing here on Christmas.

Notice Dan Fielding yet again has nothing to contribute to the conversation.  Also, not everybody celebrates the imaginary birthdate of your magic friend in the sky's son.

-----
This last post conclusively proves that Arvid is in fact Laurel Prussing. Sad. - Anonymous on 2009-06-22 @ 9:30am

Keith_Hays's picture

Whatever purpose it might or might not serve, repressing a indeputable factual statement in the press is inappropriate

Repressing an indeputable fact. Just what is an indeputable fact? Something, or some one is deputable when it or he is fit to be deputed or suitable to be a deputy. Accordingly a indeputable fact is one not fit to be deputed or not suitable to be a deputy.

Three Score and Ten Plus One

Keith Hays

 

{oops!!}

What purpose would that have served?

Whatever purpose it might or might not serve, repressing a indisputable factual statement in the press is inappropriate

illinipunditposter

 

Notice only two registered users went on arguing here on Christmas.

Members of our heathen contingent

So, just because it's Christmas we're suppose to forget we have a president who on one day flies into Home Depot to instruct the bitter-clinging unemployed peasants how they can save $20 if they insulate their homes better and the next day flies off 6000 miles at taxpayer expense to spend $4000+ a day for 2 weeks in a posh Hawaiian locale?

So, just because it's Christmas we're suppose to forget we have a president who on one day flies into Home Depot to instruct the bitter-clinging unemployed peasants how they can save $20 if they insulate their homes better and the next day flies off 6000 miles at taxpayer expense to spend $4000+ a day for 2 weeks in a posh Hawaiian locale?

Sounds no different from any national leader of any political persuasion

Exactly.

Don't blame Obama it's so expensive to fly to Hawaii. Hawaii is a state and the Prez should be able to go to all the states on the taxpayers dime. If you have a comaint about it being so expensive it's because it's so far away. He didn't make Hawaii a state, a Republican was President then. Blame the Republicans that it is so expensive to visit one of our states.

"Don't blame Obama it's so expensive to fly to Hawaii. Hawaii is a state and the Prez should be able to go to all the states..."

Well, usually it is. Once day every century, it's actually part of Kenya. It's kind of like Brigadoon.

IlliniPundit's picture

Narc for the win.