2008 Election

What Millions Saw

A blogger has done an interesting study of the negativity of the speeches of Obama and Palin.  Of course, the media has played up that Palin was very negative.  Although, at the time of the Obama speech I know that more than a few commentators remarked how unusually negative Obama was.  This blogger cites twice as many negative Obama points as Palin.

So the analysis on Obama's negative points.

The analysis on Palin's negative points.

And yes, this is a conservative writing this.  I linked to this because of the comment someone made in my other post about viewers not being the end all, depending on what they see when they tune in.

An analysis of McCain would need two separate attacks on Dems from attacks on his own party.  :)

On Teleprompters and Speech Writers

Two of the craziest points being raised by the left the morning after the Palin speech are that she reads well from a teleprompter and that she had someone write her speech. 

Of course, this is true of every single person who has run for president in the last three decades.  Why it should be brought up now is a mystery, although it would be hard not to point to at least one of two factors.  First, she's a woman.  Second, she's not Ivy League. 

I'm guessing the second reason really is why.  Let's face it.  Teleprompters and speechwriters are kind of a dirty little secret.  The media knows about them, but doesn't really talk about them.  The public barely knows they exist.  The media doesn't think they're really necessary for their heroes, just convenient.  After all, their heroes usually went to Harvard or Yale.  If you go to the University of Idaho, you're not going to get that kind of slack.  And if you actually deliver a great speech, well, it couldn't be based on ability, there just must be some other reason.

But in light of the Democratic team this year, it's truly a laugher.  First, Biden is a notorious plagiarizer.  He not only stole a speech from Neil Kinnock, he actually stole Kinnock's life!  At least Palin's speech writer got paid.  Second, Obama used lines from governor Deval Patrick, without attribution, and presumably without pay too.  Of course, each employs speech writers. 

And of course the teleprompters are another story.  It's pretty clear that without a teleprompter, Barack Obama would still be a law professor at the University of Chicago, probably forced to actually publish something.  Obama's inability to speak off the cuff is notorious.  Ums and ers fill every interview.  Below is a great you tube just showing how glaringly incompetent Obama is without a script.

Of course, Biden without a script is no better, and arguably much worse.  To his credit, he doesn't have the ums and ers.  To his detriment, he usually puts something extremely stupid in their place.

 

Palin Viewership

From Real Clear Politics:

The McCain campaign must be giddy with this news, just out from Nielsen: Sarah Palin's speech generated 37.2 million viewers, just a 1.1 million viewers fewer than watch Barak Obama's Invesco Field acceptance speech. As Nielsen notes, only six networks carried Palin's speech compared with ten for Obama's.

That's remarkable. 

To me, from a political perspective, and without the benefit of seeing any polling, it seems that Palin has been a solid choice for McCain.  I had assumed that McCain's VP choice would be largely irrelevant, given the dynamics of the race.  Instead, he chose somebody who, because of the laughable coverage of her selection, has largely united Republicans behind his cause. 

She may not win him an extra ten percent of independents, but that's always been his job, not his running mate's. 

She may very well win him an extra ten percent of conservatives/Republicans, where unity was a huge concern a week ago, and which may be enough to keep this thing close. 

And if she helps him narrow the gender gap, it may be enough to win.

McCain's speech tonight is still do-or-die.  If, like Palin, he gets Obama-level viewership, it won't matter if he comes across as a condescending curmudgeon.  He has to hit a home run.

Remember how "The Chicago Tribune always supports the Republican"?

Well, on Wednesday's editorial page, we have nine!! letters to the editor, all about Sarah Palin (yep, every single letter is about Sarah), and not a single one of them is complimenting her on her decision to run for Vice President.  She's also the subject of two editorial cartoons, only one of them faintly complimentary. 

The lead editorial is entitled, "Judging Sarah Palin", and Thursday should be even more interesting.  The Tribune is inviting readers to send in e-mails about Ms. Palin's decision to be on the Republican ticket, and I suspect that tomorrow we will be treated to a complete page of letters about the Governor of Alaska.  I'm wondering if any of them will touch today's story from the AP about Palin admitting to smoking pot, or the story from the New York Times about her firing the librarian in Wasilla, in a failed attempt to ban certain books from the library (due to popular outcry, the librarian got her job back.  We, unfortunately, got the Palin Trainwreck as GOP VP candidate).

Sarah Palin on community organizing

From Gov. Palin’s VP acceptance speech: “I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a 'community organizer,' except that you have actual responsibilities."  Cue the laugh track.  Nor was this her only disparaging remark towards community organizing in the speech.

As someone who works side by side with community organizers on a daily basis, and as a former community organizer myself, I find that I am deeply offended by this remark.  It was obviously intended as a sarcastic joke at Obama’s expense, and she just as obviously thought she was being oh, so clever to make it.  Far from clever, however, it is instead the sort of baseless, gratuitous cheap shot that is frequently the resort of those without any legitimate argument to make, and which ends up saying much more about the speaker than their subject.

She doesn’t try to cloak it much, either.  You don’t have to search for the meta-message here, because she’s right out front with it:  she thinks community organizing is of lesser value, and community organizers are irresponsible, as in lacking “actual responsibilities.”  Idealistic do-gooders.  You know, slackers.

By choosing this remark to attempt a dig at Obama, she has instead deliberately insulted community organizers everywhere, as well as everyone who’s ever been a community organizer, everyone who’s ever been helped by a community organizer, and everything that’s ever been accomplished by community organizing.  That’s a very long list.

It includes nearly all of the civil rights movement in this country.  It also includes pretty much the entire labor movement.  It includes a whole lot of church groups, and neighborhood watch groups, and after school programs, and clean up efforts, and condo and home owners’ organizations, and PTAs and PTOs, and just about every form of grassroots collective action you can think of, including the Founding Fathers.  It is the practical application of our freedom of association in action.  In short, the stuff that makes America the envy of the world.

She doesn’t even try to distinguish good or bad, but paints liberals and conservatives and anarchists and God-fearing citizens of the republic all with the same brush.  Every neighborhood organization that ever tried to get rid of an adult bookstore, every group that ever protested at an abortion clinic, every collection of parents concerned about anything, they’re all the same.  They’re community organizers, so she thinks they’re of lesser value.  Objects of derision.  Butts of the joke.  I’m not laughing.

But at least now we finally know who Sarah Palin “really” is.  She thinks it’s funny to make jokes about people who try to work together to make life a little better for their families.  That makes her an arrogant, elitist bureaucrat, committed to top down authoritarian government, dismissive of citizen empowerment, and out of touch with the actual meaning and history of democracy in a free country.  And that’s too bad.

What Could Have Been

I'm watching the Republican convention right now, and Rudy Giuliani is just awesome.  Huckabee was pretty good earlier, but I thought Romney was awful.

But Rudy is just awesome right now, and it's making me a bit bittersweet now, as I wish his own campaign had displayed any of the competence he's showing tonight in support of McCain, and it looks like he's getting a great response.

Media on Palin

The MSM is starting to sense their overreaction, and walk it back a bit:

A front-page story in The New York Times on Tuesday and articles in other news media reported that Ms. Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party for two years in the 1990’s.

The information in the Times article was based on a statement issued Monday night by Lynette Clark, the party’s chairwoman, who said that Ms. Palin joined the party in 1994 and in 1996 changed her registration to Republican.

On Tuesday night, Ms. Clark said that her initial statement was incorrect and had been based on erroneous information provided by another member of the party whom she declined to identify. The McCain campaign also disputed the Times report, saying that Ms. Palin had been registered consistently as a Republican.

After checking the party’s archives, Ms. Clark said that she could find no documentation that Governor Palin had been a member of the party.

Oops. 

Unlike some people, Sarah Palin does nothing to make me more likely to be enthusiastic about John McCain, mostly because I've been saying for some time that this election isn't really about McCain, and I stand by that. 

But the media's idiotic reponse to her selection (Meme:  "It's the vetting."   Really?  Do you want to put some more thought into that?), echoing that of the worst elements of those on the left and in the Democratic Party, is making me absolutely more enthusiastic about supporting McCain.  And I'm starting to sense I'm not the only one.

I doubt Palin, or the overblown and transparent media bloviation surrounding her, will seriously impact the dynamics of the race - it's still Obama's to lose, as it has been all along.  But I wonder, as I have for a while, if at some point the public tide will turn on this obvious and over-the-top media worship of Obama.  Will it happen before November?  Or will it happen after, during the first scandals of an Obama administration, when the public starts to ask, "Why didn't we know more about this stuff when this idiot was running?"

The MSM may very well win this election for Obama - they certainly won the Primary for him - but I also wonder if they're hastening their own decline into irrelevancy in the process.

There's more than one person around here questioning how you can juggle running for Vice President and caring for a Down's baby

Do I understand correctly that Palin has a baby with Downs syndrome less than 6 months old?  If true, then McCain has essentially given up the race.  There is no way that a mother with a baby that young, particularly one with special needs would have the time to spend on the campaign trail in the next two months.

Amazing. You would not have said that to a man candidate.

--quotes are from the IP thread about John McCain announcing Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential nominee

 

So, I'm going to take another of my patented risks and bring up a topic that is probably going to make people scream, and get me banned from IP.

It's going to be considered sexist and politically incorrect, but that's okay; I know from IP and today's newspapers I'm not the only person thinking these thoughts, so I'm going to delight in being called a "Neanderthal" and a sexist b-rhymes with "rich".  Hopefully, I will also get a few people to see where these concerns are coming from, and what impact they may have on others.

When John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his pick for Vice President, he spent a great deal of time talking  about Trig, her 5 month old son, who was diagnosed in utero as having Down's Syndrome.  Given his mother's age when she became pregnant with him, it was a very definite possibility.

Sarah and Todd Palin made a decision that not all agree with--they decided to have this baby, and by all accounts, he appears to be a little angel.  Currently, it appears that Trig's older sisters are helping to care for him as they travel with their parents on the campaign trail.

However, Down's Syndrome children do not have an easy go in this life, even if their mother is the governor of Alaska and the family has an income of almost $243,000/year.  Down's Syndrome children are frequently born with heart defects, specifically:  Atrioventricular Septal Defect (formally called Endocardial Cushion Defect), Ventricular Septal Defect, Persistent Ductus Arteriosus and Tetralogy of Fallot.  (information courtesy of the National Down's Syndrome Society website).  It is not uncommon for Down's Syndrome babies to have heart surgery within six months of their birth to correct these issues.  While Down's Syndrome children now live into their 50's and 60's, just 40 years it was not uncommon for a Down's Syndrome child to die before they had reached 30 years of age.

Down's Syndrome children also frequently receive play therapy, speech therapy, and other social services before they start elementary school.  While in school, they are usually enrolled in Special Education services.  All these things--the medical needs and the educational/social services--are a major juggling act in the best of circumstances, when one has been in one's community for several years and has the knowledge of which agencies to call, and the social support of friends and family to lend a hand with babysitting (whether of the child or its siblings), a little help around the house, or a cassarole for those days when you just can't seem to get anything done enough to even start making dinner, much less someone whom you can sit down with to have a cup of coffee and vent over how overwhelming it can all be.

As someone who was a single, 26 year-old mother when my child (now an adolescent) was born, I know how hard it can be to raise just one healthy child.  I can't imagine trying to campaign for Vice President of the United States with a healthy 4-month-old child.  And Sarah Palin is going to do this with a child who may have health issues, and will certainly start needing services in the next 18 months?  It is with concern that I note that we have not been told how severe Trig's condition is--will he live an almost-normal life, or will he have severe medical and social issues throughout his life?  Some will state this is none of my business, but if his mother is Vice President and running around the globe, will Trig's dad, the "First Dude", be the one juggling all the doctors and other services needed by a child with Down's?

From today's Wall Street Journal (page 4): 

"It was liberals who found themselves questioning whether Gov. Palin can adequately care for her growing family while running for the vice presidency or, if it came to that, running the country.  And it was conservatives who found themselves championing the feminist view that women can do it all--and denouncing skeptics as sexist.

Barbara Licthman, a retired social worker in Sarasota, Fla., said her liberal friends keep questioning whether it is appropriate or wise for the mother of a special-needs infant to take on such a demanding job.  Ms. Licthman, 69, has similar concerns--and wonders why the family-values conservatives aren't chiming in.

"This is where I see the hypocrisy," Mr. Licthman said.  "When you're campaigning for vice president, you're on 24/7.  Who's watching the baby?  And what kind of nurturing is going on int that 17-year-old's life if she's pregnant?"  her vioce rose in frustration.  "But you can't talk about it, because it's politically incorrect," she said. 

Ina Roy-Faderman, 44, a hospital ethicist in San Francisco, says she, too, has been criticized for raising questions about Ms. Palin's choices.  "That's the first thing people jump on," she said.  "What's wrong with you?  Aren't you a feminist?""  Ms. Roy-Faderman chose to work part-time when her son was born two years ago, and she says she would never question a mother's right to work.  But it is a matter of balance, she said, "and when you have five children, one with special needs, the balance cannot be in favor of a high-stress, overtime job."

From the New York Times, " A New Twist In the Debate Over Mothers", page 1:

"When Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska was introduced as a vice-presidential pick, she was presented as a magnet for female voters, the epitome of everymom appeal.

But since then, as mothers across the coungry supervise the season's final water fights and pack book bags, some have voiced the kind of doubts that few male pundits have dared raise on television.  With five children, including an infant with Down Syndrome and, as the country learned Monday, a pregnant 17-year-old, Ms. Palin has set off a fierce argument among women about whether there are enough hours in the day for her to take on the vice presidency, and whether she is right to try.

It's the Mommy Wars:  Special Campaign Edition.  But this time the battle lines are drawn inside out, with social conservatives, usually staunch advocates for stay-at-home motherhood, mostly defending her, while some others, including plenty of working mothers, worry that she is taking on too much. 

"How is this really going to work?" said Karen Shopff Rooff, an independent voter, personal trainer, and mother of two in Austin, Tex.  "I don't care whether she's the mother or the father; it's a lot to handle," she said, adding that Ms. Palin's lack of national experience would only make her road more difficult.

"When I first heard about Palin, I was impressed," said Pamela Moore, a mother of two from Birmingham, Ala.  "But when I read that her special -needs child was three days old when she went back to work, I knew this is not someone who would put what is right for the people first."

...In interviews, many women, citing their own difficulties with less demanding jobs, said it would be impossible for Ms. Palin to succeed both at motherhood and in the nation's second-highest elected position at once.

"You can juggle a BlackBerry and a breast pump in a lot of jobs, but not in the vice presidency," said Christina Henry de Tessan, a mother of two in Portland, Ore., who supports Mr. Obama.

Her thoughts were echoed by some Republicans, including Anne Faircloth, daughter of former Senator Lauch Faircloth of North Carolina.  Being a governor is one thing, Ms. Faircloth said, and Ms. Palin's husband, Todd, seems like a supportive spouse.  "But running for the second-highest office in the land is a very different kettle of fish," she said. 

Many women expressed incredulity--some of it polite, some of it angry--that Ms. Palin would pursue the vice presidency given her youngest son's age and medical condtion.  Infants with Down syndrome often need special care in the first years of life:  extra tests, physical therapy, even surgery.

Sarah Robertson, a mother of four from Kennebunkport, Me., who was one of the few evangelical Christians interviewed to criticize Ms. Palin, said:  "A mother of a 4-month-old infant with Down syndrome taking up full-time campaigning?  Not my value set."

Ms. Palin is "essentially outsourcing her duties as a mother for the sake of personal political ambition," said Ms. Robertson, gazing down at her own 6-month-old daughter, snuggled against her chest.

________________________

While I can't state how well Sarah Palin is doing as the governor of Alaska (I'm hearing that her approval rating is around 80% positive), my thoughts are that her family currently has a lot going on, even in the best of times, and while Mrs. Palin may be a fantastic candidate for national office in ten or twelve years, she should have declined her current offer with a statement about her "family needs at this time being incompatible with the demands of the postion", and offering to assist Mr. McCain in any other fashion that would be of assistance.

Feel free to discuss (or throw brickbats!).

 

  • Congenital cardiac defects occur in up to 50 percent of children with Down syndrome.
  • Early diagnosis via echocardiogram is crucial within the first two months of life, even if no symptoms are present.
  • The majority of heart defects in children with Down syndrome can be surgically corrected with resulting long-term health improvements.
  • Experience and success are the key factors in selecting a hospital and surgical team for heart surgery on infants with Down syndrome.
  • (courtesy of the National Down Syndrome Society)

Uncle Mom

We've seen this all before.  Angry left-wing activists and diehard Democratic partisans going full tilt against someone who is in a societal group that they feel is and should always be on their side.

 

We've seen it with Clarence Thomas and Condi Rice being depicted as Uncle Tom's.

We've even seen it with Hillary delegates who Obama's own political godfather called an Uncle Tom.

We've seen it this election where gun owners and religious voters were depicted as duped by the GOP to vote against their own interests during the 'bitter' comment flareup.

And we've seen it with conservative women figures and voters, who they just can't contemplate may disagree with them subjects they consider fundamental to women's rights.

 

And now they're attacking Palin for having a daughter in a tough situation and making a choice to take responsibility for her actions, with love and support of her family.  Pretty much the ideal of the social conservative movement... recognizing we're all sinners, recognizing that love should be unconditional, and doing the right thing to protect innocent life.

 

To the religious right this is a story of heroism.  Not embarrassment.

To the left-wing NARAL types, Palin is just an 'Uncle Mom.'

 

And that's just sad.

Frum Reader on Palin

David Frum from NR has been a critic of the Palin choice.  He put up an e-mail Saturday that contained a nugget that I really liked and to a large degree agree with.

My final thought is that (as you know), the GOP is in desperate need of re-branding. Palin does bring that ... my only regret is that McCain had to reach so far down into the GOP talent pool in order to accomplish that. That says volumes about the state of the party. 

Don Fowler amused by New Orleans hurricane

"The hurricane's gonna hit New Orleans!"
"That just demonstrates God's on our side."

Fun-loving Don Fowler, former National Chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrBus8ORR78

Unbelievable.

Obama on Experience

 

most of you spend enormous amounts of ink complaining about how broken the politics of Washington are, how sordid and inefficient and ineffective it is and yet during the course of campaigns or conversations you're looking for validation in terms of how well does this person work the system you are constantly decrying,
you are saying is broken and doesn't work and I think it is important at some point to ask do we need someone who is not steeped in the very traditions
you say do not serve the American people.

So Obama picks Biden, McCain picks Palin.  Oh, and how many times have we heard Obama "shame" someone in his own party? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why I'm Excited

I just read where Bill Maher said that watching Obama made him realize how conservatives could get so excited about Reagan.  Well, I think conservatives are getting excited again, for the first time since Reagan. 

The bottom line with Palin is that she's the first person I've ever seen who seems to put her actions where her words are.  A true reformer, with a lot of guts, principles, and great values.  She's going to surprise a lot of people and be the difference in this election.

Sure, there are plenty of drawbacks but my bottom line is that I think she has what it takes to win this election and to be a good vice-president and president if needed.  Reasonable people can agree with whether she's got enough experience.  Although my sense is that Democrats, who didn't care about Edwards lack of experience, or Obama's or Ferraro's will never give up insisting that she's lacking.  The voters, well that's a different story.

For now, I'm in with both feet!

McCain's choice?

McCain's supposed to announce today.  Who do you think he'll pick?  Pawlenty and Romney are apparently out, and I've heard speculation about Ridge and Palin.

Update: Sarah Palin will be the first female GOP VP nominee in history.

Can't You Feel The Unity?

Goodness:

A black Hillary Clinton delegate on Sunday accused state Senate President Emil Jones of calling her an "Uncle Tom."

Jones -- Barack Obama's political mentor -- denied using the racially loaded slur against Chicago political consultant Delmarie Cobb, but two aldermen who said they witnessed the Saturday night exchange back up Cobb's account.

"Last night, I was called an 'Uncle Tom' by Emil Jones in the lobby of the hotel, right in front of [Ald.] Freddrenna Lyle and [Ald.] Leslie Hairston and [Ald.] Latasha Thomas," said Cobb, a member of Clinton's Illinois Steering Committee. "I walked over to him and asked him, 'What did you just call me?' "

The embarrassing flap came on the eve of the Democratic National Convention, which will open tonight with a string of Chicago speakers talking about Obama's life story. Jones is often referred to as Obama's "political godfather.''

Unity.

Biden :)

Wow.  Biden.  I was shocked, but happy for Republican chances in November.  I've been hoping for this ever since I heard what I figured to be preposterous rumors of this pick.

So to hear the guys at First Read come out with this statement demonstrates pretty well how out of touch much of the media is with the average Republican.

On the GOP side, the sound you heard was disappointed silence. Of everyone on the short list, the candidate many Republicans least wanted to see Obama pick was Biden.

Actually, guys, this was a dream come true for me.  It’s time to start figuring out how McCain stacks up against Hillary in 2012. 

A few random thoughts on the Biden pick.

The low expectations set by Obama in his Philadelphia speech are put into action with this pick.  Biden has offended Indians and blacks in his public comments in a way that would have taken him out of the running for this spot a decade ago.  Maybe he can offer a spot to George Allen in his administration and allow Allen to redeem himself as well.

Congress has the lowest approval rating of any public institution in America.  Two Senators, neither of whom has been able to distinguish themselves from their colleagues, seems politically suicidal.  Biden is everything that everyone disdains about Congress.  In 20 years Obama will be too.

Picking a pro-choice Catholic accentuates Obama’s problems with abortion and will cost Obama Catholic votes.  I remember when an evangelical friend suggested to me that a Giuliani nomination might gather a lot of extra Catholic votes for Republicans.  I told him that actually the opposite might happen because pro-life Catholics will actually tolerate a pro-choice Protestant more than a pro-Choice Catholic.  For example, Bush actually gained in Catholic votes against Kerry vs. his numbers against Gore. 

Obama is offering some relatively commonplace policy ideas that certainly don’t distinguish him from any other Democrat.  What did distinguish Obama was that he supposedly represented a new way to engage in politics, including a more moderate tone.  Now he’s picked a career politician who demonstrated during the John Roberts and Samuel Alito hearings to be a Dick Durbin wannabe when it comes to partisanship.

The Democrats have correctly underemphasized Biden's foreign policy background.  Simply, chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations committee has little to do with your abilities in Foreign Policy and more to do with inside the beltway politics.  Knowledgeable, perhaps.  But still highly inexperienced.  I recall when Dick Lugar wanted to run for President and was hoping Republicans would buy this line as well.  With most issues, Congressional experience can translate well to the executive, but not in Foreign Policy.  Besides, Biden was wrong on the surge, wrong on the partition, and according to Obama, wrong on the original authorization for the war.

Finally, what bothers you more?  Serial flip flopping?  Or serial plagiarism?

Signs Point to Biden

Caine and Bayh have reportedly been told that they haven't been selected. Also, a private plane flew from Chicago to Delaware and CNN observed a flurry of activity at Biden's house.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/22/activity-at-the-bidens/

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/fun_with_flightaware_whats_thi.php

http://donklephant.com/2008/08/22/evan-bayh-and-tim-kaine-are-out/

Misunderstanding based on ignorance

It’s unfortunate that the News-Gazette wasn’t able to get all the details correct regarding Tony Fabri’s press release.  They bit on Fabri’s misinformation and unfortunately missed the real story.

Here’s a little background.  We have been looking for ways to improve the way that we draw information, especially signatures required for election day poll books, off of the registration applications that we receive.  Up until recently, we were using a Kofax product that required a great deal of programming that was beyond me or my staff.  At a conference, one of my staff members saw a demonstration of Teleform, a software package that not only could do what I needed, but could also integrate with the new software we were developing in house, including pulling data off of type written forms.  The City of Chicago and Cook County are already using the product. 

I got a demonstration module to verify that it would indeed work with our software.  I also did some research to look for other packages that could work.  I wasn’t able to find one and two calls I made to other software companies (ABBYY was one, the other I can’t remember), did not result in comparable packages.

We passed a budget amendment at the July meeting to allow us to pay for this software pending a state grant. 

We submitted a $41,000 purchase order to the County Purchasing department.  I received a call from Deb Busey informing me that software purchases over $25,000 required a bid according to state law.  At this point there was no intervention from Tony Fabri and he was not involved.  I informed my vendor who gave me a new quote on a reduced package that included fewer work stations.  Unfortunately, he caused a little bit of confusion because he did what most salesmen would do and he also quoted the remainder of the $41,000 initial quote.  I was on vacation and my staff submitted the wrong quote.  The vendor immediately caught it, since the second quote was useless without that base software package, similar to purchasing an upgrade of Excel without an older version on your computer. 

My staff then VOIDED the one order and submitted the quote for $22,950, which was under the statutory limit, and which would meet the needs of our office.  The $22,950 PO was submitted on Wednesday.  That was then VOIDED because the Auditor’s office incorrectly informed my staff that the limit was $20,000.  We resubmitted two POs, one for the base software and one for an additional module.

On Friday, my staff followed up on the Wednesday submission and learned that the Auditor’s staff was waiting on a decision from Fabri on whether to process it.  We continued to wait and then yesterday I asked for an update from Fabri.  That’s when I finally received his memo explaining why he was not accepting the PO. 

The problem is, the Fabri memo is inaccurate, and that is the real story.  Fabri claims that the PO’s in total amount to $41,000 when in fact, $18,000 had been voided a week prior to Fabri’s memo.  Either Fabri’s computer system doesn’t let him know that the PO was voided or after 18 months on the job (if that’s what you call it) he’s not yet able to understand the operations of his office.  I explained this to Fabri in a lengthy e-mail exchange where upon he let the purchase order go through.  A least one media source took this as a misunderstanding and didn’t run a story that they had intended to go with.  The News-Gazette did run the story, although do to their lack of understanding or editing for space, didn’t get all the facts straight.

The story to me is this.  First, Fabri’s office misinformed my staff of the $25,000 limit on software purchases.  Second, Fabri waited 7 days to respond to our concerns and in fact informed the media of the issue, incorrectly it turns out, before he ever approached me.  Third, we voided the one purchase order, and Fabri somehow wasn’t able to understand or was just plain ignorant of that all important fact.  At no time was there a $41,000 request from our office on Fabri’s desk awaiting approval. 

In retrospect, I certainly could have done a few things differently.  Nevertheless, I’m confident we have a solid product that exceeds our expectations.  The fact that other election authorities are using it also provides opportunities for development over time.

But whatever criticism you might have for my actions here should be weighed against my overall record. 

But the real issue here is Tony Fabri, who demonstrated himself in this episode to be largely ignorant of the operations of his office.

Linking McCain to Abramoff?

Didn't they try this already?

From CNN's Ticker:

Obama camp links McCain to Abramoff scandal

(CNN) — Barack Obama's campaign is linking John McCain to the infamous Jack Abramoff scandal that ended several Republicans' political careers three years ago in a new campaign ad hitting Georgia airwaves Wednesday.

Oh yeah, that's right, they did... and factcheckers called them out for it:

The Democratic National Committee proposes to spend unlimited amounts of money to "tell the real story" about John McCain before Republicans can "start smearing" the eventual Democratic nominee. But the line of attack the Democrats outline to their potential donors in an e-mail contains some claims that are false or misleading.

...

It says McCain "looked the other way" rather than investigate Jack Abramoff and a Republican "Culture of Corruption." In fact, McCain's investigation led to a prison term for Abramoff and the downfall of several powerful Republicans. His investigators didn't probe members of Congress directly, but that wasn't the job of his Indian Affairs Committee. And in any case, federal prosecutors opposed a competing congressional investigation which might have interfered with their own efforts.

Obama, in his desperation at his lead evaporating has turned to the hard-hitting DNC play book to smear McCain with deception.

Of course if you look at the other items in that factcheck.org article, you'll notice he was already doing so.

The DNC paints McCain as favoring "endless war" in Iraq. What McCain actually said is that he wouldn't mind a hundred-year troop presence "as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed."

...

The DNC message makes criticisms of McCain that could be directed at its own leading candidates as well. It notes that he lacks training in economics, which is equally true of Clinton and Obama. And it accuses him of "staggering" reliance on lobbyists for campaign help, when Clinton also has substantial aid from lobbyists and Obama has some from former lobbyists.

Obama supporters have themselves convinced that Obama somehow hadn't gone negative yet. But as with any partisan, Democrat, Republican or otherwise, negative attacks don't tend to come off that way when you think it's "the truth."

Meet the new kind of politics, same as the old kind.

UI Withholding Foundation Records Related to Obama?

I'm not sure I want the UI getting in the middle of a Presidential election.  Why would they be unwilling to release records like this?  Isn't that the whole point of having them at a public institution? Is there a harmless explanation I'm missing?

In the process of tracing down the Obama-Ayers connection, I located a large cache of documents housed in the Richard J. Daley Library of the University of Illinois at Chicago. These documents are the internal files of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a small foundation, founded and inspired by Bill Ayers, for which Obama served as board chairman (almost surely at Ayers’s behest). Although the library initially promised me access to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records, top library officials mysteriously intervened at the last minute to bar access. There followed a struggle between myself and library officials over my right to examine the documents....

I need public help to gain access to this critically important repository of information... Please consider contacting the president of the University of Illinois system, B. Joseph White, to ask him to take immediate public steps to insure the safety of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records, to release the identity of the collection’s donor, and above all to swiftly make the collection available to me, and to the public at large. You can find an e-mail link for White here. Telephone, fax, and mailing addresses for White’s offices can be found here .

Of course, this is related to a larger problem surrounding Obama:

Just to review, the public cannot get access to paperwork related grants distributed by then-state-legislator Obama (records from 1997 to 2000 aren't available); his state legislative office records (which he says may have been thrown out); he refuses to release a specific list of law clients, instead giving a list of all of his firm's clients, numbering several hundred each year; he won't release his application to the state bar (where critics wonder if he lied in responding to questions about parking tickets and past drug use); he’s never released any legal or billing records to verify that he only did a few hours of work for a nonprofit tied to convicted donor Rezko; and he's never released any medical records, just a one-page letter from his doctor...

The new politics looks an awfully lot like the old politics, doesn't it?

UPDATE:  More here.  This is not the sort of attention I want the UI to get.  Why not just release the documents?

Syndicate content