Economic Development

Today's NG:

The city council on Tuesday is expected to make a final decision on "Big Broadband," and the vote could determine whether the Champaign-Urbana high-speed Internet network will continue or be buried.

The council is schedule to vote on the project during its regular meeting Tuesday night at 7 in the City Building, 102 N. Neil St.

Maryland consultant Doug Dawson will travel to Champaign for the meeting to answer questions council members have about the project.

Fearing that the city would be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in the years following the network's construction, some members and Mayor Jerry Schweighart in recent weeks have expressed concern about the financial sustainability of the network.

Tuesday's Council agendas are here, with links to supporting materials for the Broadband discussion.

Potentially huge ramifications for CU:

The clock begins ticking Tuesday for local governments to decide whether they are willing to accept a $22.5 million grant to fund the Big Broadband proposal after officials received word this afternoon that the project will be funded by the federal government.

The announcement ends months of anticipation and gives public bodies 30 days to decide if they are willing to accept the grant.

The Champaign City Council is scheduled to meet March 16 with a Maryland consultant who audited the high-speed Internet proposal. Champaign Mayor Jerry Schweighart in February said that there is a possibility the council may deny the grant.

Discuss.

As promised, Tom Kacich at the NG looked at the winning and non-winning bids for the developers of Eagle Creek Resort:

The now-closed Eagle Creek Resort on Lake Shelbyville could be reopened in less than a year with an investment of more than $3.7 million, according to the bidder selected by a state agency to operate the property.

The bid documents by BMDD Resorts of Decatur were obtained from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources through the Illinois Freedom of Information Act. The department also provided the proposals of the four unsuccessful bidders – Sullivan Marina & Campground LLC, GolfVisions Management Inc., KemperSports and HG Golf Properties LLC.

Further, the agency disclosed the scores that a three-member IDNR group assigned to the five bids. BMDD received 71.1 points (out of a possible 100), compared with 48.5 points for Sullivan Marina, 48.3 for GolfVisions of Northlake, IL., 41.5 for KemperSports of Northbrook and 40.5 for HG Golf of Danville, Ind.

I love the work done by Tom Kacich at the News-Gazette.  He's been closely watching the collapse, deterioration, and bids for redevelopment of Eagle Creek, and today he has more:

Eagle Creek seldom in its 24-year history has been a thriving success. And last July, the 138-room lodge, convention center, golf course and marina near Findlay, about 70 miles from Champaign-Urbana, was closed over health and financial concerns. A report done for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources estimates it will cost at least $900,000 just to remove mold-damaged infrastructure and fixtures from property.

IDNR asked for bid proposals to reopen and operate Eagle Creek and got five of them.

But in a surprising development last week, it found four of them lacking minimum standards and awarded the contract to BMDD Resorts Corporation, a Decatur firm with no experience running a resort or a golf course.

IDNR hasn't revealed any details of BMDD's bid, nor did it explain to other bidders how their proposals failed to meet the minimums.

Adding to the intrigue is the fact that the BMDD principal, Dennis Ballinger, has been a regular contributor to Democratic Party politicians in Illinois, including House Speaker Michael Madigan ($12,500 over the last five years). Maybe it's just a coincidence, but it doesn't look good.

Dennis Fayhee, owner of the Sullivan Marina & Campground, also on Lake Shelbyville, was one of the unsuccessful bidders for Eagle Creek. He'd like to protest IDNR's decision to reject his bid – and under the rules he has to do so by Thursday – but he doesn't know why his bid was rejected, nor why BMDD's was the only one to meet the state's standards.

We'll know soon, as the bid documents are supposed to be released this week.

This news out of Chicago is surprising, especially since Chicago is facing serious economic challenges. 

Chicago is fighting Wal-Mart from entering the Chicago market and is specifically targeting larger type "big box" stores.   I often shop at Wal-Mart and Sams Club and even buy my furniture and applicances from Sams Club.   I appreciate their commitment to low prices.

If Wal-Mart is so bad, couldn't people just decide to not work there if the pay and benefits are not attractive?   Also, if the people of Chicago did not want lower priced products, couldn't the big box critics encourage customers not to shop there?  Here in Champaign-Urbana, these stores appear to be attractive to both customers and quality employees.  

"Burke said the measure -- which would apply only to companies with 50 or more employees who benefit from a city subsidy -- would satisfy labor leaders who have opposed more Wal-Mart stores in Chicago."

Why are labor leaders deciding what choices the customers of Chicago should have?   I don't have any problem with labor leaders negotiating for themselves, but I don't think labor leaders should be deciding what's best for customers. 

"Wal-Mart spokesman John Bisio issued a statement after the meeting saying the proposal "is the wrong direction for a city that desperately needs jobs and economic growth."

I've always wondered why I've never seen a Walmart in Chicago.   Now it makes more sense.   As a taxpayer and consumer, I don't want other special interest groups making choices for me.   It's hard to imagine life without Wal-Mart and Sams Club. 

There are many IP readers who have differing opinions about Richard Florida and his theories/work. The current issue of The American Prospect has an interesting article about Florida's work. It is by Alec MacGillis of the Washington Post.  His article also includes references to other written pieces that taken to challenge Florida.

Pattsi Petrie

Campustown is without a doubt the economic hub of the community.  According to the 2007 University District Existing Conditions Report (part of the Campustown Action Plan), 19.72% of the sales tax generated in the City of Champaign came from the University District (Campustown).  In addition, the report states that 8.87% of the total property tax generated by the City of Champaign was derived from the University District. (Hat Tip: Bulldog)

Recently the University District Advisory Board was disbanded after many meetings were cancelled.

After speaking with multiple council members, bar owners, and a few students, I grew very disturbed.   There is an obvious disconnect between the Mayor and the bar owners.   The Liquor Advisory Commission is not working.   The University District Advisory Board clearly was not working.   The Mayor is making claims that he has made things clear and some bars are arguing otherwise.   After listening to multiple sides of the situation, there is (at the very least) a communication problem.   These types of problems are solvable. 

Yet you have THE economic epicenter of the community arguably on the brink of a huge political and economic shift that is certain to bring significant change.   A change that impacts some serious stakeholders and could possibly undermine the very goals that the city and mayor are working towards.   A change that possibly brings serious short-term challenges on many levels.

I think it would be in everyone's best interests if key stakeholders had a special summit or one-time special committee formed to focus on campustown safety.   This summit, study session, special one time committee, whatever, could be designed to plan in advance of Unofficial, while improving communication among the key stakeholders of that district, and looking the top 1-2 safety concerns outside of Unofficial. 

It is not reasonable to expect that any one group should shoulder all the blame or responsibility.  This is a great opportunity to bring people together and work for a cause everyone agrees with.   What are the major challenges?   What can a group do to make the situation better?   Where does a group need help?   What can one group to do to help the other group?   ALL the groups should be engaged.  

1) The Mayor and Council

2) City Staff

3) Police Department

4) The Bar Owners

5) The University

6) Property Owners

7) The Retail Business Group

8) Student Senate

9) Irish Illini

(Did I get them all?)

The agenda could be two-fold preparing proactively for Unofficial and also working together to get everyone in campustown on the same page.  This is obviously a great opportunity to do great things with something like this.

I don't know why these commissions are not meeting and don't want to suggest another commission or committee that is not effective.   Hopefully, everyone can keep it simple and constructive.   People don't need extensive documents.   No master plans.  As little finger pointing as possible.  Keep it short-term and specific so it doesn't turn into another bland committee.   It doesn't have to include economic development.   It doesn't have to focus on economic concerns, even though it's obvious we need to keep things in balance.   We can keep it somewhat simple and be very direct, yet respectful about everyone's concerns. 

Saftey.   It's a good thing.  

Communication.  It's a good thing.

And PS - if this type of summit is even possible, let's try to set it up so the crazies don't come in and talk about how they send their kids away so they can insulate them from the horrors of this community.  : )   Instead, let's ensure the key players are working together to make the key economic hub of our community safer and more attractive. 

In the past, I have posted investigative reporting articles printed in the Chicago Reader about the TIF Districts in this area. The current issue has yet one more incredible article detailing exactly what is happening with the spending of these funds. Along with this article, here is the archive of Reader articles over the years giving one of the best lessons in use of incentives for economic development. Yes, I know that you are thinking how does this apply to the local scene. The lessons apply because Champaign just extended the TIF district east of the railroad tracks along University for one more year and probably will propose further extension. And probably more importantly, the 155 districts in the Chicago area are costing Illinois residents tax dollars to support the Chicago schools.

Pattsi Petrie

Overly broad.   Heavy handed.   Unchecked.  

Surprisingly, I'm not talking about another one of Prussings commie proposals.  

Instead, Mayor Schweighart appears to have gone completely around the bend.

After being so impressed with the community rallying around the notion that you don't criminalize a property owner for the acts of criminals on the owners property, Mayor Schweighart is moving to shut down bars for 30 days because of patrons involved in drinking games.   Even more sad, the Mayor is giving bar owners the option to avoid being shut down for 30 days if they voluntarily go to 21 yo entry.  

He is obviously getting radical trying to push a 21 year old bar age even though he can't get it passed in council.    No shame. 

You have bars being penalized for pouring drinks to participants of a bar crawl.

You have bars being penalized because patrons were playing trivia in a bar and that trivia may have been associated with drinking games.

You have bars being penalized because the group participating in the bar crawl were promoting the bar as a stop.

I'm not kidding.  

You'd think I was kidding, but this is actually happening.

While a bar or two may have crossed the line and actually engaged in promoting drinking games, the Mayor has taken full advantage of his Czar powers and is acting like a dictator gone crazy.

This isn't the first time.   The Liquor Czar shut down a bar earlier this semester because a patron brought in a ping pong ball and a few were playing a drinking game on a table.    The bar didn't provide the ping pong ball, but were essentially penalized $10s of thousands of dollars in lost revenue by being shut down. 

I'm not kidding. 

You'd think I was kidding, but it actually happened.

What is the protocol for shutting down a business?   Is the penalty a function of a formula, or is the penalty a function of how grumpy the Czar is on a particular day?   Rather than fining a bar $10s of thousands of dollars, I would think a $500 fine would be appropriate.   Even more appropriate would be to fine the individual for doing something you believe to be wrong.   Is it too much to ask that a "conservative" mayor promote individual accountability? 

I am 100% in favor of the bars and the city working together and implement common sense mechanisms to curb underage drinking and challenges that come along with it.    Being unreasonable does not encourage reasaonable behavior.   In fact, I'm so shocked by this I'm actually going to block off a day on my calendar this spring and unofficially take a drinking day.   

The Liquor Czar's approach to "making bars accountable" is about as silly as making the bars 21 on Unofficial and trying to manage all the individual apartment parties.   It's a beautiful strategy you really have to see to appreciate.   In fact, I encourage you to check it out this spring if there are any bars that have not been shut down.  

Right now I'm really appreciating that Mayor Schweighart doesn't operate in the strong mayor system that Urbana does.   He seems to get drunk on power.

The sensible thing to do would be to work together with business, not encourage them to work against you.   It's not too late to start acting sensible.  

U.S. High Speed Rail Network

I had a beer and a very interesting conversation last night with a conservative who was making a case to lobby for a high speed rail corridor through Champaign between STL and CHI.   It would get us CMI folks to Chicago in less than hour.   It is not unreasonable to assume that you could commute to Chicago for work and be back in time for dinner.   This could be a game changer for Champaign County, no doubt. 

My first questions to him were (1) why do we want more government and (2) aren't we already spending too much of our grandkids' money (3) even if it's good, how can conservatives argue for limited spending and then be all for it when it beneficial to our district???

I got home and started doing some research.   I was particularly interested in trying to analyze the economic benefit of the huge investment.    Here is something that I found interesting.   In that NYT article they posted a GAO report on the topic.

Apparently there are people in the area pushing for the local High Speed Rail (HSR) and they are hoping to have it in place by 2020.   I'm very curious to understand the arguments behind this effort, but more importantly the assumptions.

I have to admit, how friggin' cool would be to hop on 200+ mph train and be in Chicago or St. Louis in no time at all, and even get work done assuming the train has internet service?!   How many execs (I'm thinking Brenda Employer) would look at Champaign County where you get easy access to the big city without the cost?!   How many more people would visit Champaign or want to work here since we'd be "connected".    I have to admit, there is huge upside potential for our community if this goes forward.

There is a lot to research on this topic and I'm hoping that people will share some great stuff.  

As nice as this idea is and how fun it is to dream about this stuff, does the cost vs. benefit support such a huge capital investment?   Secondly, would we be investing in such a project if the feds weren't giving us "free money"?   Thirdly, if it is such a great idea and the feds don't support the effort, why don't we pay for it ourselves?

I found this conversation interesting and thought it would be a good starting point.   Enjoy.   It's always fun when thinking of ways to spend someone else's money.    : )  If this conversation is half as interesting as my discussion last night, this will be fun. 

Update: For those who are interested in becoming informed on the issue you can check the website:  http://www.midwesthsr.org

It has come to my attention that a local developer will be asking the Champaign City Council for development concessions on a local campustown development.   While I appreciate developers investing in our community, I hope Council will take into serious consideration a few concerns of mine.

1) "Three-O-Nine" Green currently has liens on the building while local contractors have been waiting to be paid for "almost a year".   I heard number of $2M or more in liens that I don't know how to confirm, but does someone know how to look up liens so that we can get an actual figure?

2) When the council gives concessions to a developer, it is not fair to competing developers who did not benefit from such agressive concessions in the past.   Standards should be set that are consistently enforced.   This is beneficial on many levels and ensures that those getting special treatment do not benefit from an unfair competitive advantage over other local developers.   Will this developer be providing something that nobody else is willing to provide?   Is the demand so great for student apartments that we need to ignore existing standards?   What do you say to other developers who did not benefit from the same concessions who must compete with the developer who was not required to meet those standards?

I would like to provide you some additional perspective and explain why I think the council should think long and hard before rewarding developers who do not fullfil their obligation to local contractors.   I was able to get in touch with a contractor directly impacted by the failure of the developer to pay their bills.  

Please take a moment to appreciate how irresponsbile behavior can adversely impact a business provider who sells construction product on low margins.   I have confirmed that the situation I'm explaining is actual and not speculation. 

• A contractor was required to take out loans against unpaid receiveables to pay for employees and product.  They are paying interest cost on a large receivable.
• That same contractor is losing any opportuninity of investing that payment and receiving a return on that investment.   So not only is the local employer paying interest to the bank, the local employer is losing out on considerable opportunity cost as well.    These are not recovered from the developer even if they were to pay tomorrow. 
• There are signficant costs for a small employer to file a lien and hire an attorney to chase down developers who do not pay their bills.  Ask Deb Feinen what she would charge.   These are not recovered from the developer even if they were to pay tomorrow. 

Whether or not the City Council decides to grant concessions to the developer, I hope everyone will take this matter seriously and not encourage and/or reward those who screw over local employers. 

This needs to stop right now.   Before any more time is invested working with developers who are not paying their bills, we need a clear and very good explanation of the situation I just decribed.

Furthermore, the city needs to acknowledge this problem on their own development projects at Burnham and M2 and work to make sure this doesn't keep happening.  

I came across a great tool for understanding deficits.   It ends up that Illinois can boast that there are 8 states who have worse deficits when you measure the deficit per capita.   Click on the 'values' button below the graph and it will sort in order of deficit per capita.

1) Conneticut* - $1,171

2) California* - $1098

3) NY* - $918

4) NJ* - $806

5) Mass* - $769

6) Delware* - $638

7) Minnesota* - $613

8) Wisconsin* - $569

9) Illinois* - $543

10) Hawaii* - $529

* - Voted Democrat in the 2000, 2004, and 2008 elections. 

Don't tell Illinois democrats that we have room to increase spending.   I don't want to give them the wrong idea.  

My name is Brenda Employer and I own a small business that currently employs 20 people.  

My business is such that I can setup shop pretty much anywhere.   We've launched successfully, but now I'm looking for a place to call home for the long-term.

We've had a breakthough in the company and we expect that we will likely grow to total payroll of about $10,000,000.  

I've been looking at a few places, preferably small metros in/around college towns, and I currently have a few favorites:

Bloomington, IN, Lafayette, IN, Columbia, MO, Iowa City, IA, and Champaign, IL.

I'm a bit partial to the Champaign, IL because that's where I graduated college.   I'm a midwest gal, so I'd prefer to be within driving distance of family.   Can you bloggers please tell me why I should consider moving my business to the great state of Illinois and to the great City of Champaign?

Your help would be greatly appreciated.   We hope to build a long and prosperous relationship with your community.

Best Regards,

Brenda Employer

What a beautiful day to work outside!   It seems like it had been raining 40 work days and 40 nights until this break in good weather.   That certainly hurts construction progress.

Now that we have some good weather, we should be heading down the final stretch and completing the long-awaited sidewalk outside of the M2 project.  

For the surrounding businesses and patrons of downtown who have been looking forward to the sidewalk opening back up, look outside and watch the progress in action.   Almost there!   

Even though there are some critics of M2, Downtown Champaign will look very attractive when the construction is finally complete.  

I must say it is a beautiful building.

I will never pay for my kids to attend Fresh/Soph year at the UofI.   How in the world do you justify charging $16,978 when you can go to Parkland and take 30 hours for $2,910 (at $97/credit hour).   At parkland, you learn the same basic stuff, but the teachers there are more likely to speak English and not be some inexperienced grad student.  

Since we're trying to be as liberal as California, where they just raised tuition rates 32%, I suspect we'll end up jacking fees at tuition here while we pay Richard Herman $244,000 per year and Joe White to remain the university earning $300,000/yr.   I suspect we're paying them big dollars to look for new jobs and I suspect they enjoy pensions as well.

(UCLA students protesting in California)

What does a UofI undergraduate tuition pay for?

Do the UofI student have to pony up more tuition to pay for research park buildings?

I think the Daily Illini should proactively look into the staggering cost and the certain-to-increase cost of tuition.  

Why is it increasing so incredibly fast?  

If my kid wants to get a finance degree, how does his tuition get allocated?

How much of the tax payer subsidy actually goes to education (when you can get the same thing or better at Parkland for 90% (signficantly) less, at least when it comes to general education)?

Does the undergraduate student wanting to get a finance degree have to pay significantly more to fund research efforts by the university?

It would so great if the DI called out the scumbags who author textbooks and change the versions every year so that the students cannot buy used textbooks.   Seriously, is your great salary and gold plated benefits not good enough?   Are you really going to snake an additional profit like that by screwing poor college kids?  Is your version of Econ 101 so much different than any other professor's version of Econ 101?

I finally found a protest in California that I can support.   Those kids need to remain committed to keeping costs contained in government. 

But wait, speaking of Econ 101, a local economics professor posted a breakdown on this with important information (linked) that starts to address my questions from above.   The university spends 39.5% on reasearch.   The receive 15.3% from grants and contracts.   The total UofI budget is $4.17B and that includes $517.9M in employee benefits.  

Hold up.   $517.9M/$4.17B = 12%.   So the university pays 12% of the ENTIRE fiscal budget towards employee benefits.   Is it just me, or does that seem sort of high?   Generally, the cost of benefits should be approximately 30% of entire compensation.    I'm very curious to learn the university payroll totals and why they do not provide this number in the pocket facts summary.   I guess we could email them at infosource@uillinois.edu if anyone else is curious. 

What will happen when the state runs out of money and fails to pay the University of Illinois 18.3% of their expected revenues?   I know some people will try, but you can't blame this on George Bush. 

Clearly, the only solution is more revenue.   

This ordinance was so bad as drafted, that it apparently needed a second look:

November 19 Commentary in News Gazette.

Ideally, Prussing would have the people most able to help her craft a good ordinance working with her to solve the problem, instead of spending their time and energy having to fight her unreasonable notion of good government.

What if the Chamber of Commerce hadn't rallied the business community?   I supect that took time and energy that could have been better spent solving problems and promoting our community.   I suspect the proposed ordinacnce would have passed because the city (at Prussing's urging) was hell bent on passing this.  The most in depth analysis you might have heard would have been from a local landlord stating, "I have no problems with this."

Where was the Urbana Business Association on this?  

After the vote, I was told that Mayor Prussing cancelled a meeting with the Chamber of Commerce once she heard they would be opposing the ordinance in its proposed form.   On top that, she apparently ditched a meeting to discuss the ordinance with the Urbana Business Association to discuss the ordinance (at the 11th hour). 

Would the city have called a meeting to discuss the ordinace with the UBA unless the Chamber hadn't pushed back?    Probably not.  Wouldn't it be logically to have your local business group weigh in?  

The more I hear about this, the more amazed and amused I become.    Thank God for the Chamber of Commerce injecting some common sense into the process. 

I've been taken back the story coming out Chicago about the McCormick Place losing business.   Intitially, I didn't think to take a second look.

Link 1:ABC News Story that has some interesting analysis both in the video footage and supporting written analysis/links.

One at the recently departed Health Care Information show said the electrical services bill in Chicago reached $40,000. In Orlando, the same work costs $4,000.

Is it true that work rules require a union electrician to plug in a machine?

"McCormick Place has had a difficult chore in getting and keeping shows unless they get their costs down. It's as simple as that," said Daley.

"When we talked about shift changes....we've stepped up," said Dennis Gannon, Chicago Federation of Labor.

They may have to step up again.

On Wednesday, union leaders and other service providers will meet to talk about ways to keep Chicago competitive in the convention business.

The plastics industry has held its trade show in Chicago since 1971. Now they're leaving town. The trade group that puts on the convention determined moving the show to Orlando will save as much as $20 million.

Link 2: Chicago Tribune Article.

Though restaurant show attendance fell 24 percent this year, to 54,000 exhibitors and potential buyers, the event still pumped an estimated $86 million into the local economy, according to the Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau. The show is committed to remain here in 2010 and 2011.

The reason I took a second look is that I got to thinking...if a convention brings that much postive impact to the community, what about attracting employers?   What is the impact of employers who chose other, more competitive states?   What is the impact of employers who have left the state or have expanded in NOT Illinois?   If a flippin' trade show can pump $84M into the economy, imagine what 54,000 additional exhibitors jobs would be bring to the community and state, especially if they were not short term.

As I think about this I remember that Sentator Frerichs worked hard to elect Blago who took little time to excessively jack up business fees and eliminate competition on government contracts.   Now sentator Frerichs wants to increase income taxes as the solution.   Maybe a little more effort should be involved in taking our heads out of our (fill in the blank) and start applying some common sense.

On the bright side, California executed a similar approach to drive away business.   At least us Illinoisians are not the best at being the worst.  : )

Don't worry.   I'm sure you'll be comforted by idea that we can address this problem and assurance that will not have to pay for it.   That will be addressed by raising the taxes on investors and jacking up fees on the employers.  

Impressed.   Kudos to the N-G for the great series of articles on the Research Park.

Jury Still Out on Research Park

UofI Tenants Help Fill Space

How UofI Park Compares with Midwest

I always thought the Research Park was a solid idea but now I have mixed emotions.   I liked the idea because it would (and definately should) attract private jobs.   I'm a bit suprised to learn that "A total of 827 full- and part-time employees work for private companies or the hotel/conference center in the park."   That number seems low to me.

Also...is anyone else hearing the rumors about an investigation into how the project was awarded?   I heard these rumors about a month ago and then this series of artcles comes out noting "The original agreement between the UI and Fox/Atkins to develop and operate the park expires in May. The UI has solicited proposals from firms interested in developing land for the park's next phase, which includes acreage south of the I Hotel and Conference Center. A new contract with a developer could be awarded in the spring."   Can someone help me understand if these rumors have no merit or if there is actually an investigation going on?   The coincidence just seems too convenient. 

Thoughts on the Research Park?    Are there other factors besides the "the economy" that have impacted our ability to attract private jobs to this area? 

Illinois made another Who's Who list: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/11/11/these-10-states-may-be-closest-to-financial-collapse/

"Many of the states, like California, New Jersey and Illinois, have a long history of borrowing to close budget gaps."

I love it when we send professional politicians and professional government types to run state business. 

I wonder who Senator Frerichs is going to suggest we elect for Governor.   He picked a winner with Blago, maybe he can go 2 for 2.

I'm sure California, New Jersey, and Illinois have more similarities than simply creative borrowing.

Obviously, a tax increase is the solution.

I had a discussion today with someone that claims that a landlord in Urbana cannot ban a guest even if that guest is criminal or engages in criminal or nuisance behavior on their property.

Apparently, when you call the Urbana police, they will tell the individual that they will not enforce such a ban.

The logic behind this is that tenants should have the same property rights as mortgage payers.

I recall some liberal gal at the Urbana City Council meeting made that argument.

Doesn't it seem reasonable that you should be able to ban somone from your property if that individual is impacting another tenant's right to quiet enjoyment of the property?

Doesn't it seem reasonable that you should be able to ban someone from your property if they are caught vandalizing your property?

The more I hear and read about the Chronic Criminal Nuisance ordiance and related issues, the more silly the whole idea sounds.

Is it reasonable that a tenant should have ALL the same proprty rights as a property owner?   I don't think so.