From yesterday's News-Gazette:
A new task force will explore over the next several months whether Champaign, Urbana and Savoy should require subdivision developers to provide land or cash for future parks.
The task force will also explore other ways park districts could acquire property in growth areas.
The creation of the nine-member task force comes some two years after the Champaign Park District board first asked the city council, in December 2005, to consider requiring land or cash donations from subdivision developers. During the interim, park district and city staff members put together a 52-page report detailing "issues and needs" for providing parks, trails and open space in new subdivisions.
We've discussed this before. Philosophically, I don't care for requiring land donation, but as a practical matter, it doesn't really bother me, as it would negotiated with developers as part of pre-annexation agreements.
I don't like this idea of relying on figures from the National Parks and Recreation Association, though, to determine how much green space a community should have per capita. From the earlier post:
Champaign Park District Executive Director Bobbie Herakovich said the National Park and Recreation Association recommends that cities have at least 10 acres of park land per 1,000 residents.
They are hardly a fair source, and while I know people are loath to question the motives of the good people who run our parks, this organization's function is explicitly to advocate for more parks and greenspace. Using their figures for a discussion like this is like basing the government's dietary recommendations for meat consumption on a standard set by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association.