*Uncategorized

Baffled

How can something like this happen? 

It was great that Curtis Road finally reopened before christmas!   It is very nice to access I-57 via Curtis Road.   Ideally, it would have been renovated and scheduled to open when the Curtis Road ramps were completed on I-57.   It's a shame that my family wanted to use the Curtis Road ramp but avoided it all year because of all the construction.   A little background.   But they are going to close another section of the road this spring.   Ugh!

I can only imagine how smooth things will go when they start planning for the high speed tram.  

I have little confidence in the planning ability of our local and state government based on what I'm witnessing and reading about our local road projects.   

Updated: I-57, not I-74.   Thanks for correcting me.

PETA Joins Fight Against Campus Bar

If you walk into Joe's Brewery on busy night, chances are you will see a crowd of college students around the Lobster Zone Machine.   Here is video of what you could expect to see:

As a result, PETA's office in Norfolk, VA has asked the bar remove the machine immediately and threatened the group would mobilize their members against the bar.   For more information losters' ability to feel pain, please visit LobsterLib.com.   I am sickened by capitalist pigs abusing animals for cheap "amusement" in order make a few extra dollars. 

I hope you will join me and follow the advice provided on LobsterLib:

If you come across the Lobster Zone, you can help lobsters:

 

1. Call and write the owner of the restaurant. Politely, but firmly, let him or her know that games are supposed to be about skill, fun, and prizes, not suffering—and ask that the contraption be removed.

2. If the tank is excessively crowded, or if it looks as if there are dead lobsters, complain to the health department.

3. Write a letter to the editor of your local paper. Let people in your area know that all animals, including lobsters, deserve our consideration.

Here is a sample letter to the editor that you can write:

 

Letters to the Editor
[name of newspaper]

Dear Editor:

If grocery stores kept live pigs or chickens crammed inside tiny glass tanks along with recipes suggesting that the animals be boiled alive, there’d be a lot more vegetarians! But how many of us have walked by supermarket lobster tanks without as much as a second thought?

Take a look the next time you’re at the store: Often, lobster tanks are filthy and overcrowded, with lobsters piled on top of each other, as I witnessed at [name] grocery store this week. Even under the best of circumstances, eating lobsters can be a public health risk. Seafood is the number one cause of food poisoning in the United States, and shellfish are involved in more than 66 percent of all seafood-related illnesses. In fact, as much as 10 percent of raw shellfish are infected with organisms that can cause hepatitis, salmonella poisoning, cholera, and even death. Keeping these sea animals in filthy tanks doesn’t make them any safer!

It is also cruel to confine animals of any species to a small space and slowly starve them. Most lobsters in restaurant and grocery store tanks are never fed in order to prevent the water from being fouled with excrement. Of course, this does nothing to protect consumers from the mercury, DDT, PCB’s, dioxin, disease-causing bacteria, and other contaminants that are commonly found in lobster flesh.

It’s time to liberate these and other animals from the pot by switching to a healthful, humane vegetarian diet.

Sincerely,

B is for Business

Government takeover of medical care----cut costs and spend more

We are close to a  1 to 2 trillion increase in spending with new expansion of government control of the health care. All the bills were basically the same in form and provisions---big hoopla.

And, as President Obama promised, he will pay for the expansion from "savings" from spending on health care during the last year of life. And other "savings; good luck finding out where they will come from.

Except: we know the doctors will suck it up and accept worse payment. And so will nursing homes, hospitals and others because HHS and the governemnt run insurance will pay less. In fact, they will pay less whether the new laws pass or not. But, hey, we can all learn to deal with that. Don't we all think doctors are overpaid, and hospitals wasteful, and nursing homes beds of luxury? You will all learn to understand foreign language doctors who will work cheap.

Poor medicare. It will be hit with 500 billion or so in cuts. And as a bonus included in that, or added, is the amount of cuts in the medicare hospice program, a model of medicare financial management, where the current length of care is down to around 13 days in Carle's program, if my friends are accurate.  Not far different from the national average. The example of hospice is ever tighter close monitoring and restrictions from the feds, and the understandable reactions of doctors and staff trying to adjust. They simply refer late in the game, to stay clear of trouble with the overmasters.  So, even as hospice care increased overall, the amount of services declined. Shorter days of care means less care, in civilian terms.  Never mind that patients and families are deprived of wonderfully beneficial care and and society benefits, the government can say they cut "costs" and covered more people.

Same pattern more or less under the insurance companies, who tend to follow the medicare lead where ever possible. After all, what is a prudent insurance company going to do when employers complain about costs of premiums.

So, the new bill fixes all this, right? Not at all. In fact, we get even worse financial management and more spending. Here's how it will work. We get massive increases again in Medicaid, as the states get hit with a mandated expansion, although some, like Illinois already expanded coverage. Never mind that they cannot pay for it.

The feds, who also are deeply in debt, will increase their share, even take over medicaid in Ben Nelson's state. Medicaid is the fasted growing sector of spending in health care, far beyond the private insurance sector. Has been over the years, but at the same time, Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals, doctors, and nursing homes have declined. Again, same pattern---cover more people, but pay less per service. My friends tell me that now medicaid reimbursement is at about 20-25% of costs, more or less. Want to know more about what to do when you get only 20% of a bill paid. Ask Champaign County Nursing Home. You shift costs. You increase the volume of private pay.You up your charges to insurance.

Ask Union Hospital, Illinois what happens. Oh, nobody answers there. Because, they went out of business in the '90s when they ran out of their UAW endowment fund in an effort to cover their shortfalls. They had reached the dead zone of 85% plus medicare/medicaid paid patients, and could not survive with so much goverment largess.

That is the future of American health care. Plenty of other examples abound. There are two terrible losses we face in America, following our trends in health care. With the domination of insurance and government to meet our demands to have more, and control more, we have increasingly eroded the all important patient-doctor connection. Not just doctors. Try taking good nursing care of 6-8 patients during 4 days of 12 hour shifts on a med-sugical floor. Ordinary business.

The liberal and Democrat wing of politics will have their way---but we will all be the worse off. Face time with doctors is a major source of good quality care and treatment. The research proves that. The doctor patient relationship cannot be freely treated as a commodity---medical care and treatment is a service and less of it costs dearly.

Secondly. America is not Europe, or Russia, or Canada. We lose the chance for innovation and creative health care solutions in this growing monstrosity when we add another massive layer of government and insurance company overlay. Government run "pilots" cannot be freely innovative, and are never turned loose. If the government puts in a 5 cent share, they will control the dollar show. Instead of real innovations we get such pilots as "evidence based" practice. Standardized, by the book medical care results. Never mind that another government agency's research found more dying and illness result from the "follow the numbers" evidence based care. That is the style of innovation we will get.

Already, we have a 50% overburden of regulation, financial management and oversight on health care. All this new spending is not just to give more coverage. Any available intern's, politician's, and staffer's old and new idea to manage your care is shoved into these new plans. Commissions, new powers of the Secretary of HHS, bureaus, potentates, czars, all abound.

And, by the way, so sad, the poorest and sickest will not get more care or better treatment, witness the history of government run programs everywhere in the world. The disparate health of poor and less educated compared to better off abounds. With government run care, they still get sicker more, use treatment less in every country. Why will we be different?

Dr. Gonsa Megilla

Merry Christmas

Happy Halloween!

 

How about a pumpkin thread?

One Billion

How many zeros in a billion?

This is too true to be funny.

The next time you hear a politician use the word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend,but here are some math figures that will help putting that figure into some perspective.

A.
A billion seconds ago it was 1977 and we were listening to the BeeGees.

B.
A billion minutes ago it was 107 AD

C.
A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it, but that is not true after I get this post done and is just an educated guess taking out proposed budget and dividing it by the seconds in a year.

While this thought is still fresh in our brain...let's take a look at New Orleans ..
It's amazing what you can learn with some simple division.

Louisiana Senator,Mary Landrieu (D) was (and might still be) asking Congress for 250 BILLION DOLLARS to rebuild New
Orleans . Interesting number...what does it mean?

A.
Well... if you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans (every man, woman, and child) you each get $516,528.

B.
Or... if you have one of the 188,251 homes (before Kartina) in New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.

C.
Or... if you are a family of four.....your family gets $2,066,012.

Let's look at the Economic Stimulus Package, which is now somewhere around $3 trillion dollars (3,000 billion), counting banks, Auto Makers, Stimulus money, etc. Politicians said we can better stimulate the economy by giving the money to Automobile Mfgs. Banks, Lending Institutions, and put each man, woman and child in debt $10,000, for who knows long. Would the economy have been better served to give each man, woman and child $10,000 and let us spend it. If I am going in debt $10,000 at least give me the money.

Dear Washington, D. C

HELLO!
Are all your calculators broken??

Here are some interesting taxes that go into the general fund of governments to pay for billions:

Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax (Fed)
Federal Unemployment
Tax (FU TA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax (That is the fund we borrow from ourselves and now owe $4.4 Trillion Dollars, or $4,400 Billion
Road Usage Tax (Truckers)
Sales Taxes
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
(And to think, we left British Rule and even had a Tea Party to avoid so many taxes)

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

How many of these taxes existed 100 years ago...and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.

We had absolutely no national debt...
We had the largest middle class in the world... and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What happened?
Can you spell 'politicians!'

And while I am being taxed for the minutes on my phone, I used to be able to just wait for an English Information Assistant, but now I have to press '1' for English. Why should I have to spend time on the phone (being taxed) just to confirm I speak the National Language?

What happened?????

Veterans Checks? Left in the Dark.

This subject came up last week on another thread here by JustAnotherBody, but it seems appropriate for another post with some of the information gained since from the comments and links found about it. Part of the Recovery Act was $250 checks to disabled folks on SSDI and Veterans disability and a few other categories. So far it appears the Social Security related checks have more or less gone out last month with a few hitches here and there. Meanwhile Veterans appear to have been last in line. From last week's post:

Seems Vets are last on the list again. The $250.00 Stimulus Package promised Vets that are receiving V.A. Compensation or Pension that they would get a $250.00 check "sometime in June". WTF is that all about? Everyone else getting the money, *Social Security, Retired Railroad Workers*, got theirs in May, and now Vets have to wait...and wait...and wait....to see if they're even going to be acknowledged. Figures...they just release a press release, 2 months ago and then it's forgotten...

So far the only definitive information that has come out of all the speculation, rumors, and other comments is that a letter was sent out from the VA saying we should be receiving the checks in June... but the only time frame given beyond that is that if you don't receive anything by JULY 10th, then you should call and ask about it.

The other that appeared definitive has since fizzled. The Treasury noted June 9th as the "planned completion date" for the Veterans payments. A quick glance at the calendar and we can see that the agency charged with actually printing and distributing the money is quickly looking to have missed the target date.

Was the VA late in getting them the information they needed to make the payments? Did the treasury drop the ball? Is there any media coverage out there on what Veterans should be expecting or putting some pressure on the bean counters to get the job done? Nobody seems to know. Meanwhile cable news outlets were covering the big issues when I checked them this morning... Obama's teleprompter and "sex with ducks" jokes on CNN... Fox for its part was laughing at the Daily Show laughing at them...

Very informative.

It seems very likely that we won't know until the checks are about to, or already, have landed in our laps. Maybe tomorrow... maybe the end of the month... maybe in early July... maybe later if they miss any more planned dates. A lot of veterans are living check to check with their disabilities... and it doesn't seem like too much to ask for a candid and clear answer to their questions on this.

Every Day...

...Is Memorial Day in War Time

 

Remember the fallen. Honor them by taking care of those who fight on in the battlefields or back home.

As part of my continued support of the concept of "Don't do nothing"... another avenue of support brought to my attention this week: donating old cell phones. Doesn't matter what kind or how out of date. They get recycled and the money gets used for phone cards for troops to call home and stay in touch with their families where a phone call can mean everything in the world to them. We have a local drop off for this program here in town, and worth checking out if you have old phones stuffed in a drawer somewhere.

The local drop off point is:

Liberty Tax Service
1403 E Washington
Urbana, IL 61802

For more information see the link above or here. As usual I'd like to plug for the local Toys For Troops organization here as well as the USO and AnySoldier and generally for any organization to help support our troops overseas, their families, and veterans needs.

I can think of few better ways to honor the fallen than to take care of those still in the fight, those that survived the fight, and their families.

Local Fraud Gets Busted

From the News-Gazette:

URBANA – A Sullivan man has been indicted by a federal grand jury of defrauding the Social Security Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs of approximately $280,000.

Robert J. Warren, 44, is tentatively scheduled to be tried in July. He was arrested Monday and appeared Tuesday in Urbana before U.S. Magistrate Judge David G. Bernthal, who released Warren pending trial.
Advertisement

The 12-count indictment returned last week said that Warren served in the U.S. Navy from 1984 to 1988 and applied for veterans benefits in 2002 and social security benefits in 2004. Warren was granted V.A. benefits for being unemployable as a result of a service-connected disability and Social Security benefits for a mental impairment which caused him to be disabled.

The indictment alleges that beginning in 2002 and continuing to October 2008, Warren feigned and exaggerated various symptoms and causes of mental and physical disease and claimed he could not work around people, when in fact he worked at a tavern and was a volunteer member of the Sullivan Fire Department.

This particular story is particularly infuriating for me. A lot of the time periods for his claim are very close to my own battles with the VA and SSA. Beyond just defrauding veterans with real issues out of the money available to help them, he was using up the resources and putting more veterans further back in line to get the help they desperately needed. All the while, apparently, he was working two jobs and getting along just fine... making others wait, scrape, and suffer even longer. What a scumbag.

 

It's frauds like him who make it harder and harder for people with real issues to get the benefits they're entitled to. I can't help but imagine that it's cases like this that have turned both systems into a bureaucratic nightmare where every claimant is viewed with suspicion and the system becomes more and more adversarial.

 

But the blame isn't his alone. Both agencies involved here, the VA and the SSA, really seemed to drop the ball if they let this guy collect benefits for unemployability/disability to the tune of 280 grand. Both agencies are required to confirm income and work history for such benefits. Even short term work has to be explained in detail as to the reasons why you were unable to continue (was it due to your disability?) or how you were able to do the work even short time with your ailments (ie is intermittent severity consistent with your ailments/diagnosis).

 

Given the counts don't include IRS fraud of some sort, it's safe to say they didn't even bother to look for several years. Something they normally do initially and often to continue benefits.

 

Who suffers from this? The people who are really dependent on these programs. Not only does it take money out of an already financially strapped system, it adds new anecdotal evidence to the adversarial process to treat claimants with even more suspicion. The frauds make it harder on the folks who really need it. Hopefully his sentence will reflect who he has harmed.

 

(h/t: VA Watchdog.org that linked to the Chicago Tribune article on this)

I am B is for Business

I was hoping it wouldn't have to come to this...

After the most recent hijacking of my 41% thread, I've decided that is necessary to post about B if for Business.    In that post anon bloggers accused Brad Jones of being B if for Business.   It even got silly with people suggesting that Brad Jones should put out a statement to the contrary.   Good grief.

The Brad Jones accusation is (and probably will be) the best compliment I've ever received since I started blogging.   Many people on this thread appreciate how hard Brad worked in the last election and why he would be an ideal Champaign County Auditor.  For me to be considered in such high regard (in a thread about county financial issues with analysis) could not be more flattering.

I always try to keep discussions on track and focus on the subject being discussed.   I'll make a great point and the counter argument will be "B is for Beating kittens!" or something of that sort.   Or they will make accusations and try to focus on my motives and not the topic or argument.   Or they will intentionally try to distract you and talk about who I am and whether or not I blog from my grandmother's basement.   Really, when I just explained the $10M labor premium taxpayers have been paying since 2005 when our nursing home is losing $3M when you round up?    Really, when I made bold predictions about the CCNH 2008 financial results?  

Right now some pissed off liberal is reading this, even more pissed off that I classified my arguments as "great".   Heh.   I don't like making things about me, but things have gotten out of control when almost every thread contains a funny B is for Bugs me comment and they can't seem come up with anything to counter my argument.   Right now some pissed off liberal is reading this, even more pissed off that I'm right as usual.

For the pissed off liberals on this blog who can't do anything more than try to distract readers from the points I'm trying to make, this is your thread.   How about some conspiracy theories that I hate the american worker and want their children to be sold in slavery to the red chinese?   How about a B is for (you fill in the blank) contest so all the hippies can get a good chuckle while they drink their non-starbucks coffee proudly?

For the conservatives (and maybe even the liberals who appreciate the discussions and provide constructive feedback) who want to have some good-hearted fun, I can use your help to keep them guessing:

When someone asks about the the identity of an anonymous blogger, please respond "No Comment".

If you must comment because the urge is killing you, here are some suggestions:

"I am B is for Business ...  or am I"

"I thought I heard a rumor that B is for Business was Rex Bradfield"

"I thought I heard a rumor that B is for Business was Brad Jones"

"I thought I heard a rumor that B is for Business was George Bush"

"My only comment on the subject is that anonymous bloggers should only be taken seriously when they stop being anonymous"

"No comment"

"I heard a rumor that B is for Business plays the trombone."

"I heard a rumor that B is for Business has a really big ........................ ego."

"I think I might have known B is for Business in a former life"

"No comment"

"I heard a rumor that B is for Business runs a sex slave operation.......and makes a profit"

"I heard a rumor that B is for Business in an elected official who can't come out because of obvious reasons"

"I heard a rumor that B is for Business blogs from his grandmother's basement."

"No comment"

*Chuckles knowing that some pissed off liberal is flying off the handle*

If this kind of stuff continues in my threads, maybe I'll make bumper stickers that says "I am B is for Business".   It would only take a dozen or two dozen cars with these bumper stickers to drive the pissed off liberals insane with all the contradicting rumors.   Then again, I would have to agree to pay for their insurance deductible in case of vandalism.   : )

Pissed off liberals, this is your thread.   Have at it.   Bring it.  And remember, it's not personal, it's just business.

Comic Relief: Gaffe de Mayo

From the associated press:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is celebrating Cinco de Mayo a little early.

On the eve of the Mexican holiday, Obama on Monday had an event in the East Room of the White House with Mexico's Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan (sahr-oo-KHAN').

Obama joked that it was "Cinco de Cuatro," botching a play on the Spanish word for "four" when he meant to say "Cuatro de Mayo," or the Fourth of May. He tried again, but he still did not get it right.

Now many right-wingers have given Obama heat on this for earlier campaign statements criticizing Americans for not being bilingual:

You know, it’s embarrassing when Europeans come over here, they all speak English, they speak French, they speak German. And then we go over to Europe, and all we can say [is], “Merci beaucoup.” Right?

But to be fair this line is out of context. Immediately after that he said:

You know, no, I’m serious about this. We should understand that our young people, if you have a foreign language, that is a powerful tool to get ajob. You are so much more employable. You can be part of international business. So we should be emphasizing foreign languages in our schools from an early age, because children will actually learn a foreign language easier when they’re 5, or 6, or 7 than when they’re 46, like me.

So should we be "embarrassed" of our current president's gaffe? Probably not. Instead I recommend upholding the longstanding Cinco de Mayo tradition: blame it on the tequila!

Anyways Cinco de Mayo is about celebrating the embarrassment of the French, not ourselves. I can drink to that!

Jean Driscoll is up for the Paralympian Hall of Fame

For those that have heard of or know Jean Driscoll, she has quite an amazing story. And she is so encouraging, so enthusiastic, such a positive person despite her challenges. One wonders if her trials has shaped her into such a jewel.

On top of that, the other Paralympian Candidates all seem quite amazing. I am humbled.

http://www.teamusa.org/halloffame

The Tree of Learning

My grandfather, Payne Heath taught me to read. Of a morning he would perch me on his knee and trace the letters embossed on the old black iron cook stove while grandmother made breakfast. Sometimes when I am engrossed in a book I can again smell the medley of bacon, hickory smoke, and strong coffee that filed the kitchen then. I was three. The range had come west on the Great Western railway in 1863. My grandfather’s grandfather had taken the wagon and drove to the depot in Bement to fetch it. It was handed down from father to son until it resided in our kitchen in Monticello. It was in that kitchen that I learned the alphabet courtesy of the manufacturer who had embossed it, arched across the oven door.

Each evening my grandfather read to me, not from classic children’s books, but Frazer’s Golden Bough, One Hundred and One Arabian Nights, or Longfellow or Whitman. Those were among his favorites and they became my primers as he first read a passage to me and then read it again, more slowly as his finger traced the words for me as he spoke them. Grandfather was not a teacher. He had been a railroader, a civil engineer, and a scientific farmer. But his teaching technique gave me the skill of decoding first words and then whole paragraphs at a glance. By the time I was five I was reading these weighty tomes on my own asking grandfather or my mother for help with an occasional word I could not decipher.

It wasn’t enough that I learned to read the words impressed upon the page. That was but one branch on the tree of education. To satisfy him I must also learn to read the trees of the forest and to use them. Each Saturday he would load me into the passenger seat of his 1934 Chevrolet Coupe for our weekly errand to the woodlot just past Camp Creek on the back road to White Heath. As we walked through the woods he would drill me until I learned to recognize the species from the shape of its leaf, the texture of its bark, the nature of its nut, and the aspect of the terminal leaf bud at the tip of its twig.

I learned from him how to safely fell a tree, controlling the direction of its fall by the way that it was cut. I learned that the ancient Oaks, the soul of the forest, furnished the lumber to build the sturdiest of structures. Besides giving us the sweet nuts the Hickory provided fuel for the cook stove and the Walnut made the finest of furniture. Locust trees, with their pricking needles protecting them like a porcupine’s quills, were good for fence posts though Osage Orange with its dense wood was more durable for the purpose. It was another branch of the tree of learning he was determined that I would absorb.

Before I was ten I was his assistant laying out terraces to control erosion on the farm; installing drainage tile to a fall of 1/8th inch in 8 feet; designing and building check dams to fill in the gullies that carried away topsoil to silt the bayous of the Mississippi Delta. That too grandfather considered an essential branch on the tree of education.

He passed on his love for history, both recent and ancient, a passion that his daughter shared as well. He never stopped learning. When I visited him for the last time in his room at Kirby Hospital we had a long conversation, a seminar really, on the use Meade made of his artillery at Gettysburg. It was just a few minutes later that his heart gave out. He had held his 6 month old great granddaughter for the last time and left behind a legacy of learning that I have tried to pass on as well.

Today, when I walk through the woods, or a park, or sit at leisure with a book I hear again the lessons he taught. The sapling he planted those many years ago has grown and sustained me with memories of the purest gold.

Liberty FOR ALL!

Gnightgirl, local soldier's mom, award winning homefront hero for her efforts to support the troops, and all around inspiring lady in spite of her modesty... shared a story, introducing her readers to a friend she can only call "D":

D's partner's name is Clay. He is 43 years old, and has served in the military for 20 years. Clay is one of at least 65,000 gay soldiers serving this country, and as I said, is in Iraq, right this minute.

When Brian was deployed, I got a phone call from a counselor. I got names and numbers for support groups. I got coaching on mailing, and people to talk to if I became scared or sad. There's a Family Readiness Group for me.

There is nothing like this for D, or for others in his situation. He can't easily seek out support without risking Clay's career. I can go on and on, but D says it better, in his letter to President Obama, asking him to repeal the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy:

...I am compelled to remind you that there are tens of thousands like me who continue to suffer under the current policy. My partner is currently serving in
Iraq, and is in a situation where he is under fire on a daily basis. He's a good soldier, and our country needs him to continue doing the excellent job that he
has been recognized for.

The day he deployed, I dropped him off far from the his base's main gate, and he walked alone in the dark and the rain to report for duty. Where the rest of his buddies were surrounded by spouses and children at mobilization ceremonies, he stood by himself.

The phone trees don't have my name on them, and base support services don't apply—even though we've been together for 16 years and are raising a beautiful child together.

Our communication is self-censored and we are cruelly unable to nurture each other at the exact moment we both need it the most.

If something were to happen to him no one from his unit will call me. If, like so many good soldiers before him, he gives that last full measure of devotion, no one will come knock on my door. No one will present me with a flag. It is, and would be, as if the most important thing in his life—his family—never existed.

I am not sure if I can adequately convey the mixture of fear, pride, heartache and hope I feel, all jumbled together, on a daily basis. But I ask you to consider relieving the burden of fear and dishonor from our brave men and women who risk being punished simply for whom they love.

This is my friend, D.

For my part, I'm going to pull the "lazy-blogger" and re-post part of my rant about Prop 8 (overturning gay marriage):

For those who consider liberty the ultimate goal of both government and man to defend, with their life if necessary, it is time to abandon the selfish and immoral desires to influence our government to cherish the abolition of liberty of others to defend their morality against those with a differing opinion. Their claims of tradition fall on deaf ears. Their claims of religious righteousness are as corrupt as their dedication to liberty.

To claim that one is an adherent to the Constitution and the limits upon government to which it limits to secure the blessing of the greatest gift that man could ever achieve, by natural law, right, or that of the divine... regardless of where you believe such blessings originate, allow such debates to continue in the Church, in your community, among your fellow man about the propriety of your differences. Stop and look in the mirror on what you hold most dear. Is it the liberty you claim to cherish, or the power to force others to adhere to your point of view?

Shall we be free, or shall we go down the beaten path of authoritarianism, fascism, and theocracy that empower their government to enforce an opinion, antithetical to everything that liberty stands for, that free men have little reason to prohibit, even if they disagree?

Gay men and women are fighting for the right to DIE to defend your liberty. They are crying out for the basic tenets of the Constitution you claim to love, to secure the blessings of LIBERTY, that you claim to so dearly cherish... just so that they may enjoy the same legal protections and entitlements as their peers.

You can fall back on claims of tradition, but they will consistently fall upon deaf ears on the subject of marriage as tradition has often precluded interracial, international, inter-religious, and even inter-tribal marriages depending on when and where one looks. We have shaken loose the chains of oppression on many a tradition long before this current petty debate. All who cherish liberty should quickly see through the semantics being employed to derail the fundamental argument that demands that justice be blind to the circumstances and our prejudice. The blatant favoritism for one tradition over the beliefs of others has absolutely no place in government. And if you cannot bring yourself to end the favoritism of one class, you must share it to all. The slippery slope is your burden, not the burden of gays. You are welcome to repair it, but absolute not welcome to continue it.

It's one thing to fight to keep the pledge, with or without the "under God" bit, in schools. Quite another, and far more important, to fight for "liberty and justice for all."

FOR ALL!

Widespread 'Isolated Incidents'

VA Watchdog.org has linked a couple interesting articles from Salon.com about a stunning admission of a military doctor that they are being pressured generally to avoid diagnosing PTSD in returning soldiers... caught on tape:

The recorder in Sgt. X's pocket captured McNinch in a moment of candor. (Listen to a segment of the recording here.)

"OK," McNinch told Sgt. X. "I will tell you something confidentially that I would have to deny if it were ever public. Not only myself, but all the clinicians up here are being pressured to not diagnose PTSD and diagnose anxiety disorder NOS [instead]." McNinch told him that Army medical boards were "kick[ing] back" his diagnoses of PTSD, saying soldiers had not seen enough trauma to have "serious PTSD issues."

"Unfortunately," McNinch told Sgt. X, "yours has not been the only case ... I and other [doctors] are under a lot of pressure to not diagnose PTSD. It's not fair. I think it's a horrible way to treat soldiers, but unfortunately, you know, now the V.A. is jumping on board, saying, 'Well, these people don't have PTSD,' and stuff like that."

What's noteworthy about this is that such a general diagnosis can lead to reduced benefits, or in worst case scenarios, no benefits at all from the DoD or the VA. The second article from Salon describes the "internal investigation" where the government has found itself free of wrongdoing. Nothing to see here, move along...

In a statement to Salon, Col. Catherine Abbott, an Army spokeswoman, reiterated Gilman's defense of the Army's internal investigation of Sgt. X's tape. "They did do an investigation into it," said Abbott in a phone interview. "There was indeed no pressure and no coercion to make any diagnosis other than the correct ones,."

"This story," Abbott said, "is over and done with."

Someone please help ensure this bureaucratic sock-puppet eats her own words some day.

Why?

Because this isn't a new story. It's yet another dreary sequel to previous stories. Remember the "isolated incident" of the VA employee telling doctors not to diagnose PTSD but rather other conditions with lower benefits. Or perhaps the "pre-existing condition" scam they pulled with combat vets with PTSD... instead diagnosing them with a personality disorder (assumed to be pre-existing) to deny all or many benefits.

Until some real accountability is demanded it seems that "this story," sadly, seems far from being "over and done with."

 

Following up on these older posts:

Dr. Phil on VA Failings: Dr. Phil puts the spotlight on veterans and the bureaucracy that regularly fails them while the bureaucracy responsible pulls the 'isolated incident' routine.

Bombshell: The VA Shredder Scandal reveals a depressing peek into what lows the bureaucracy will sink at the expense of disabled veterans.

Pentagon Disorder Update: Finally some action to tackle the personality disorder scam to defraud veterans of their earned benefits.

Pentagon Disorder: Part II: More of the personality disorder scam stories and a PBS special giving the issue more public attention. Still no action.

Shhh...afting Veterans: VA employee caught red handed suggesting that her staff misdiagnose PTSD patience in order to save money.

What's More Disgraceful?: New stories of the military misdiagnosing service connected ailments as a pre-existing Personality Disorder, and the denial of benefits that result.

Psychological "Friendly" Fire: Veterans struggling with the VA claims backlog and bureaucracy and how the misconceptions and deceptions pushed by the Pentagon are making it even harder for returning veterans to deal with the VA bureaucracy.

Pentagon Disorder: The Personality Disorder Scam. The DoD takes service connected disabled vets and says they have pre-existing mental problems that get the government off the hook for paying for benefits for their war time and service connected disabilities. A real travesty.

More Vet Funding But...: Some good improvements on Vet funding, but still no movement on the Personality Disorder scam being used to deny benefits to veterans.

Waiting for the other shoe... UPDATE

By way of Yahoo!'s front page and the AP:  GM CEO Wagoner to step down at White House request.  The AP is quoting unnamed administration officials for the source.  Given that it's "administration officials", as opposed to generic government sources, and the article is coming out Sunday night (GM's stock is almost certainly going to take a hit Monday morning), I tend to think the sources are genuine and Wagoner is going to be shown the door.

 

 

HG

 

UPDATE:  Thud.  From McClatchy Newspapers:  Feds declare GM, Chrysler not viable, refuse more aid.  The meat of the article will be discussed below.

Faux Outrage Over AIG Bonuses (short version)

Obama and Democrats are outraged.

Republicans are outraged.

The chatter around the interwebs seems to show that supporters of both parties are joining in the outrage and pointing fingers at the other side for either "protecting their rich republican buddies" or the Obama admin doing too little too late.

Of course neither side feels too inclined to point the fingers at themselves in spite of their bipartisan support of the Bush bailout bill (though both sides seem to be happy to disown that one along with Bush himself) and the Democratic party support of the Obama stimulus bill... both of which specifically protected prior bonus contracts. Given our system that emphasizes the role of government to uphold and certainly not to impede the obligations of private contracts, this isn't as outrageous as is now being depicted... even if the contracts themselves are outrageous.

So now that everyone is all outraged again over what they apparently couldn't do much about before, people (in particular, Senator Chris Dodd) are coming up with new creative ways to make it look like they're doing something about the situation they clearly did nothing about before and codified into law. Dodd is the Democrat who included the language protecting these contracts in the Obama stimulus bill:

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Monday night floated the idea of taxing American International Group (AIG) bonus recipients so the government could recoup the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit. Within hours, the idea spread to both houses of Congress, with lawmakers proposing an AIG bonus tax.

While the Senate constructed the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd unexpectedly added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. That amendment provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009,” which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are seeking to tax. The amendment is in the final version and is law.

It's hard to say with any certainty what the final language of this proposal may be, if it even gets off the ground to begin with, but from the attitude and descriptions thus far it seems set to become a legal battle over whether it violates this part of Article I, Section 9 (the section that states specific limits of legislative authority) of the Constitution:

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

For a quick refresher for those who may have forgotten (perhaps Dodd himself?)

bill of attainder: a legislative act that imposes punishment without a trial

In other words: this could get interesting. (long version here)

Durbin Kicking Obama Kids Classmates Out?

Chicago Tribune on this interesting conundrum:

A cruel school move

We wrote last week about Democratic efforts to strip 1,900 low-income Washington children of $7,500 "opportunity scholarships" to attend private schools.

It's an experiment in school vouchers, an experiment with little potential downside. But it's an experiment that was launched in 2004 by a Republican-controlled Congress. Today it's on the verge of extinction because the Democratic-controlled Congress wants to do the bidding of public-school teachers unions. The unions see vouchers that let poor kids go to private schools as aiding the enemy.

Language passed by the House as part of a massive $410 billion spending bill would effectively doom the federally funded program. The 1,900 kids would have to leave their schools and re-enter public schools in Washington, which has some of the worst schools in the nation.

The measure, by the way, is referred to as "the Durbin language" for sponsoring Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.

The article goes on about the hitch, which was laid out by the Wall Street Journal earlier in the week:

Dick Durbin has a nasty surprise for two of Sasha and Malia Obama's new schoolmates. And it puts the president in an awkward position.

The children are Sarah and James Parker. Like the Obama girls, Sarah and James attend the Sidwell Friends School in our nation's capital. Unlike the Obama girls, they could not afford the school without the $7,500 voucher they receive from the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program. Unfortunately, a spending bill the Senate takes up this week includes a poison pill that would kill this program -- and with it perhaps the Parker children's hopes for a Sidwell diploma.

Sarah and James Parker attend Sidwell Friends School with the president's daughters, thanks to a voucher program Sen. Dick Durbin wants to end.

Known as the "Durbin language" after the Illinois Democrat who came up with it last year, the provision mandates that the scholarship program ends after the next school year unless Congress reauthorizes it and the District of Columbia approves. The beauty of this language is that it allows opponents to kill the program simply by doing nothing. Just the sort of sneaky maneuver that's so handy when you don't want inner-city moms and dads to catch on that you are cutting one of their lifelines.

There was a debate over these issues during the campaign here on Illini Pundit a while back over the hypocrisy of Obama's words versus actions on public versus private education:

"But what I do oppose is using public money for private school vouchers. We need to focus on fixing and improving our public schools; not throwing our hands up and walking away from them."

versus his own walking away from public school (long before his move to D.C.):

OBAMA: My kids have gone to the University of Chicago Lab School, a private school, because I taught there, and it was five minutes from our house. So it was the best option for our kids.

The big question is whether he'll kick out some of his own kids' classmates while being a long time hypocrite on whether the poor deserve the same opportunities his kids have.

IGPA Response

Earlier this week, a posting at IlliniPundit referred to the internet edition of The Illinois Report 2009, a publication of the University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs that seeks to assess the state’s performance on a range of crucial issues and to offer some policy options for state leaders to consider.

The post was critical of language concerning re-publication or distribution of the report. The point of the criticism is well taken. It is NOT the intent of IGPA to stifle dissemination of the information contained in The Illinois Report 2009 and the language on our web-based edition has been changed. We at IGPA encourage state and local officials, legislative staff and policy advocates to share the information we offer, and the faculty and staff of the institute stand ready to offer our assistance to help find solutions to the many problems facing our state. Our faculty are always ready to meet with policy makers, legislative staff and others to discuss the issues we raise in the report, or others. Contact the institute at IGPA@uillinois.edu or 866-794-3340, or contact me directly at 217-244-6762.

Also: The IGPA website does indeed include an RSS feed for news releases. Click on the RSS symbol near the center top of the page at www.igpa.uillinois.edu to subscribe

Thank you,
James Paul
Director of Communications
Institute of Government and Public Affairs
University of Illinois

OUT OF ILLINOIS

January 2009 was a month of significant change for Illinois. It marked an end; it marked a fresh start; and it marked a new beginning. The new beginning was President Obama’s. Just as we pause to remember that 200 years ago this month a boy was born in Kentucky; who would grow up in Indiana; and mature to become Illinois most illustrious native son. President Obama was born in Hawaii; grew up there and in Indonesia; was educated in New York and Boston; and has become another of Illinois’ native sons to sit in the White House. His inaugural marked a new beginning for the nation. He promised to change the partisan culture of government; to end division and discord replacing it with collegiality and cooperation.

January 2009 was the end of the Governorship of Rod Blagojevich who had come to Springfield in 2002 winning his election over Illinois’ Republican Attorney General James Ryan whose campaign was, “I am not George Ryan.”. He had promised Illinois good government; a government that would be responsive, responsible, and reliable. He came with a sense of grandiosity and self-importance and when the legislature dominated by his own party did not share his vision of an imperial governorship which rivaled that of Huey Long he declared war and sought to bend the Illinois General Assembly to his will. The result was broken government and an impeachment crisis in which he could muster only one vote in both the Illinois Senate and House – that of his sister-in-law.

Governor Patrick Joseph Quinn had the fresh start succeeding to the office from which Rob Blagojevich was ousted. Illinois government had hit bottom and there was no way to go but up. The State’s treasury was balanced in red ink. For six years the ousted governor had resisted biting the political bullet and proposing to balance Illinois’ budget the only way that made sense – raising the State income tax by adopting a progressive rate structure. Blagojevich had not borrowed from Peter to pay Paul – he simply stole from Peter looting set aside funds to pour into the bankrupt general fund. Governor Quinn has the luxury of a crisis that has made the politically unthinkable prospect of increasing state tax revenue not just feasible but essential. In the economic collapse and Illinois’ budget crisis he takes office with a real opportunity.

Fresh from his stint as a witness in Blagojevich’s Senate impeachment trial Republican State Representative Chapin Rose met with the Piatt County Bar Association last Thursday. Discussing the States financial crisis he told the assembled lawyers that if Governor Quinn was smart one of the first things he would do had to be to call for an increase in the income tax. That comment was persuasive evidence that the warfare between the Governor’s office and the General Assembly was over. It was emblematic of Illinois’ fresh start.

The next few months will tell us whether President Obama’s new beginning and Governor Quinn’s fresh start will produce the kinds of change that hey both have promised. Both are hampered by the political cultures left behind by their predecessors – a culture of corruption in Springfield and a culture of deception in Washington. Will they be able to affect the change that each has pledged? History will tell us but history will also record that those efforts come out of Illinois.

Syndicate content